MXR - Phase 100  [schematic]

Discussion regarding early stompbox technology: 1960-1975 Please keep discussion focused and contribute what info you have...

MXR - Phase 100

Postby Professor SourTone » 13 Mar 2008, 17:12

Script, Block/no LED, Block with LED

Is the Block/no LED the good value option, or does it really have to be script?
Professor SourTone
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 178
Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 10:07
Location: London
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 35 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby analogguru » 13 Mar 2008, 18:31

That´s an really interesting question...
First time I heard about differences with this unit, so I looked through my guts and indeed, there was indeed even a change in the pcb layout. But this change already occured during the script era.

So I think between the late script-era and the block-era will not be a big difference. I have to check that out sometime...

analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
analogguru
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 14:58
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 112 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby analogguru » 13 Mar 2008, 20:37

So after a short analysis I came to the following results:

version 1: early script version (7632)
pcb: version 1
caps in audio path: tropical fish
op-amp-cap in LFO: 10n tropical fish
Resistor in phase stages: 22k
transistors: probably 2SC types
feedback resistor: probably 15k

version 2: later script version (????)
pcb: version 2
caps in audio path: white film
op-amp-cap in LFO: 10n ceramic
Resistor in phase stages: 20k
transistors: probably ZTX types
feedback resistor: probably 15k

version 3: early block version (7745)
pcb: version 2
caps in audio path: white film
op-amp-cap in LFO: 10n ceramic
Resistor in phase stages: 20k
transistors: probably ZTX types
feedback resistor: probably 15k

version 4: block version (7840, 7949)
pcb: version 2
caps in audio path: white film
op-amp-cap in LFO: 10n ceramic
Resistor in phase stages: 20k
transistors: probably 2SC types
feedback resistor: definitely 18k

The only difference in the audio section are the tropical fish caps and the 22k resistors instead of the white film and 20k resistors. I don´t believe that the difference between 22k and 20k will have a big influence, since this can also result from capacitor tolerances (10% - 20 %).

The feedback resistor (intensity) of 15k seems to have been changed in 1978, maybe earlier.

Alltogether it appears that the - not real significant -change has occured earlier in the script era and not together with the script/block change.

The old ones can be recognized on the tropical fish and that the wire holes are symmetrical in the middle of the pcb-edge.

analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
analogguru
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 14:58
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 112 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby Bernardduur » 13 Mar 2008, 21:37

Awesome!

Now on the sound side; how do they differ? It is still one project of me on the shelf :)
'No more....... loud music.......'
Bernardduur
Transistor Tuner
 
Posts: 1140
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 08:36
Location: Losser.........
Has thanked: 85 times
Have thanks: 464 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby Dirk_Hendrik » 13 Mar 2008, 22:07

Start naggin me throug mail tomorrow Rogier. I've got some PCB layout files you definitely want ;)
User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 4123
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 09:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 246 times
Have thanks: 982 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby Bernardduur » 13 Mar 2008, 22:42

Dirk_Hendrik wrote:Start naggin me throug mail tomorrow Rogier. I've got some PCB layout files you definitely want ;)


Cool :)
'No more....... loud music.......'
Bernardduur
Transistor Tuner
 
Posts: 1140
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 08:36
Location: Losser.........
Has thanked: 85 times
Have thanks: 464 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby Professor SourTone » 14 Mar 2008, 09:51

Wow - that is good info - thanks.

I have a script Phase 45 that's just arrived that I really like, but I'd also like a 100 for more variety. I don't want to play in the script 90 playground much - that has to be overdone.
Professor SourTone
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 178
Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 10:07
Location: London
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 35 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby Professor SourTone » 14 Mar 2008, 10:27

This is the one I'm looking at

Image

Here is a script version (not great pic, I know)

Image
Professor SourTone
Solder Soldier
 
Posts: 178
Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 10:07
Location: London
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 35 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby analogguru » 14 Mar 2008, 13:32

Both units shown are version 2 pcb´s and should be identical - maximum except of one resistor (18k vs. 15k).

Here:
http://www.modezero.com/images0000/mxr-phase-100-Bx.jpg
you can see a version 1 pcb.
Note especially the difference in component placement (10n cap) in the right back corner, de different position of the protection diode and the different placement of the jumper-wires.

analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
analogguru
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 14:58
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 112 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby analogguru » 21 Mar 2008, 07:00

Now you´ve got your chance for your personally tailored Phase 100:
http://cgi.ebay.com/MXR-Phase-100-phase ... 0039066944

and if you need a case you can buy this from the same seller:
http://cgi.ebay.com/MXR-Flanger-pedal-V ... dZViewItem

analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
analogguru
Old Solderhand
 
Posts: 3286
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 14:58
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 112 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question  [schematic]

Postby Bernardduur » 22 Oct 2013, 09:40

So the script version and the later ones ARE different!!

Got one in for repair and traced it! Main differences are the clean mixing circuit, some small resistor changes in the LFO and the resistor value in the Vref

Phase 100.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
'No more....... loud music.......'

For this message the author Bernardduur has received thanks: 9
blackbunny (29 Oct 2013, 16:11), candidate (30 Oct 2013, 08:38), D-Day (22 Oct 2013, 15:54), GorillaHuman (07 Apr 2014, 19:10), lolbou (22 Oct 2013, 15:08), marshmellow (18 Apr 2017, 23:22), modman (01 Mar 2015, 16:08), rocklander (23 Oct 2013, 00:10), zaphod (21 Feb 2015, 14:10)
Bernardduur
Transistor Tuner
 
Posts: 1140
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 08:36
Location: Losser.........
Has thanked: 85 times
Have thanks: 464 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby blackbunny » 29 Oct 2013, 16:17

So the script version and the later ones ARE different!!
Got one in for repair and traced it! Main differences are the clean mixing circuit, some small resistor changes in the LFO and the resistor value in the Vref

Is this traced from a script Phase 100? The one with the "tropical fish" coloured capacitors? :scratch:
User avatar
blackbunny
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 375
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 08:41
Location: the garage
Has thanked: 217 times
Have thanks: 109 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby Bernardduur » 29 Oct 2013, 16:45

blackbunny wrote:
So the script version and the later ones ARE different!!
Got one in for repair and traced it! Main differences are the clean mixing circuit, some small resistor changes in the LFO and the resistor value in the Vref

Is this traced from a script Phase 100? The one with the "tropical fish" coloured capacitors? :scratch:


Yep! Tropical fish caps (10n) all over the place
'No more....... loud music.......'
Bernardduur
Transistor Tuner
 
Posts: 1140
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 08:36
Location: Losser.........
Has thanked: 85 times
Have thanks: 464 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby zaphod » 21 Feb 2015, 14:54

I've just bought a fairly old block logo Phase 100, which has clearly seen better days. I plan to get it back to full working order and maybe do some small mods as well. Looking at the schematic, I really don't get why there are four extra stages which aren't modulated by the LFO, as these will not contribute anything to the phasing effect. I even wonder if they did it pourely as a marketing gimmik, to advertose it as a 10-stage phaser, when in reality it's only a six-stage. I would be interested if anyone has any thoughts or insite on this.
zaphod
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 19 Feb 2015, 02:08
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 0 time

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby armdnrdy1 » 21 Feb 2015, 15:41

zaphod wrote:Looking at the schematic, I really don't get why there are four extra stages which aren't modulated by the LFO, as these will not contribute anything to the phasing effect. I even wonder if they did it pourely as a marketing gimmik, to advertose it as a 10-stage phaser, when in reality it's only a six-stage.


The Phase 100 is a 10 stage phaser.
Pedal manufacturers are not in the market to include components in their designs that serve no purpose.

The stages you are referring to are "fixed" stages. Fixed stages do contribute to the overall phasing effect.

This is not an uncommon design.

The ADA Final Phase has 6 swept stages and two fixed stages.
armdnrdy1
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 105
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 01:11
Has thanked: 14 times
Have thanks: 66 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby uncleboko » 21 Feb 2015, 16:26

armdnrdy1 wrote:
zaphod wrote:Looking at the schematic, I really don't get why there are four extra stages which aren't modulated by the LFO, as these will not contribute anything to the phasing effect. I even wonder if they did it pourely as a marketing gimmik, to advertose it as a 10-stage phaser, when in reality it's only a six-stage.


The Phase 100 is a 10 stage phaser.
Pedal manufacturers are not in the market to include components in their designs that serve no purpose.

The stages you are referring to are "fixed" stages. Fixed stages do contribute to the overall phasing effect.

This is not an uncommon design.

The ADA Final Phase has 6 swept stages and two fixed stages.


And the Eventide Instant Phaser..............
uncleboko
Resistor Ronker
 
Posts: 438
Joined: 25 Mar 2008, 21:19
Has thanked: 50 times
Have thanks: 18 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby Fender3D » 21 Feb 2015, 17:40

TC XII too...
User avatar
Fender3D
Cap Cooler
 
Posts: 470
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 03:40
Location: Helltaly
Has thanked: 94 times
Have thanks: 121 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby zaphod » 21 Feb 2015, 20:22

I still don't see the point, since there's no modulation being applied to the phase shift. So yes, while I agree a phase shift is happening in those stage, the shift is still not being swept in any way, and it's that sweep which the human ear detect.

Disclaimer: I'm an EE with severe OCD, so I like to dig into what's really going on inside FX pedals. So please feel free to set me straight on what I just said, and I realy won't mind. :)
zaphod
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 19 Feb 2015, 02:08
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 0 time

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby armdnrdy1 » 21 Feb 2015, 21:21


For this message the author armdnrdy1 has received thanks:
zaphod (21 Feb 2015, 21:43)
armdnrdy1
Breadboard Brother
 
Posts: 105
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 01:11
Has thanked: 14 times
Have thanks: 66 times

Re: MXR - Phase 100 question

Postby zaphod » 21 Feb 2015, 21:57

That article has a pretty good summary of textbook flanger and phaser theory. R.G. Keen writes some great articles. What's interesting is that he seems to be agree with me on some important points.
It turns out that the human ear is not too sensitive to phase shifts...

The most common commercial phase shifters stop with four stages (such as the MXR Phase 90, Univibe) or six stages (MXR phase 100).

...although the effect is noticeable, it's much better if the notches move up and down in frequency.


So while I might gree that maybe there's some benefit in having some extra fixed phase shift stages, it's really not clear how much of a benfit that really is. Maybe it becomes more useful when feedback is switched on...? :hmmm: Even then, wouldn't it make more sense if different RC values were used in each of the fixed stages to enhance the effect...?
zaphod
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 19 Feb 2015, 02:08
Has thanked: 3 times
Have thanks: 0 time

Next

Return to Vintage Stompbox Corner ( ... - 1975)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests