Tonebender MKII OC75 issues

Forum dedicated to helping people debug and troubleshoot non-functional pedals or builds. Please use an clear and informative title, indicating circuit and basic problem. Don't forget to mark the issue as fixed if this is the case.
Post Reply
User avatar
noiseuoh
Information
Posts: 33
Joined: 06 Mar 2011, 21:03
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by noiseuoh »

hey everyone,
ill just start off by saying thanks to everyone who reads/helps out. absolutely love this forum.
the problem is this. i ordered smallbears OC75 mullard set for the MKII. when i test the HFE's of the trans i get something like 160 for each one. im not sure if its some problem with my multimeter or what. when i test some other PNP germaniums like AC128/122's i get a range like 78, 100... etc like you would expect. i dont know why the OC75s have generally the same HFE and why they are so high.
question number 2. im not getting much response out of my attack (fuzz) pot. there isnt much range in the settings. could this be due to misbiasing?
i also get a hell of a lot of background noise/feedback in almost any attack pot setting, except on very low volumes and the lowest attack setting.
i have added a 10nf capacitor on the input (i read somewhere that it should reduce the noise, and cut out some of the highs) and a 2.2m resistor to cut out the poping. otherwise i have a 100k trimpot on Q2's collector and a 22k trimpot on Q3's (can someone please send me a link or quickly inform me how to test the bias for my trans? i dont know how to do it with my DMM and have been searching like mad today for a simple explanation. i have been testing by ear as of now). i have r1 as 100k instead of the 10k mentioned on fuzz central (the marshall supafuzz OC75) for example.
i am using this layout and schem
http://www.aronnelson.com/gallery/main. ... ewsIndex=1
hope what i wrote makes some sense and thanks a lot for all your help.
Attachments
ulysses MKII layout
ulysses MKII layout

User avatar
noiseuoh
Information
Posts: 33
Joined: 06 Mar 2011, 21:03
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by noiseuoh »

well i figured out the DMM bias testing stuff. just for PNP's i use the red pin on the positive ground and use the black to test. and i put it to the collector yea? thanks

User avatar
DrNomis2
Information
Posts: 14
Joined: 05 Oct 2011, 09:50
my favorite amplifier: Legacy Valve Edition 5 Plus
Completed builds: Ge PNP Transistor Fuzz Face, Si NPN Transistor Fuzz Face,Madbean Gruntbox, Paul Cochrane Timmy, Univibe, Baja Real Tube Overdrive, Klon Centaur,Frequencycentral Little Angel Chorus,MXR Dynacomp,BK Butler Tube Driver 5-Knob,Buzzaround-alike,Tech 21 XXL,Tonebender Mk II, Tonebender 3-Knob.
Location: Darwin NT Australia

Post by DrNomis2 »

If you use a multimeter's Hfe test function to test the Hfe of a germanium transistor, it will tend to show a higher than normal Hfe, this is due to the fact that germanium transistors exhibit something called "leakage", what's happening here is something akin to a water tap with a worn rubber sealing washer, even though the tap is turned off water still comes out of it in drips, when the base-emitter junction-voltage of a transistor is below a certain value, the current flow from the emitter to the collector should ideally be zero,but in reality it is actually a very small amount, silicon transistors exhibit emitter to collector leakage currents in the nano-amps range, whereas germanium transistors exhibit about a thousand times more than silicon transistors, the multimeter's Hfe function interprets the leakage current as being part of the collector current, and thinks the germanium transistor has more gain than it really does, to properly measure a germanium transistor's Hfe you should invest in a Peak Atlas Semiconductor Analyser, because it takes the leakage current into account and can determine what the real gain is.... :thumbsup

User avatar
noiseuoh
Information
Posts: 33
Joined: 06 Mar 2011, 21:03
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by noiseuoh »

thanks,
ive been aware of the leakage stuff. I think its just been misbiased. Too much info on the mkii to condense. I needed the 10k on r1, a 20k on r3 and a 22k trim on r6. Think i got it sorted with the oc75s. Though still not as much response with the attack as i would like

User avatar
DrNomis
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 6807
Joined: 16 Jul 2009, 04:56
my favorite amplifier: Self-Built Valve Amp Head :)
Completed builds: Dallas Arbiter Fuzz Face,Tone Bender Professional Mk 3,Tone Bender 3-Knob,Baja BK Butler Tube Driver,Baja Real Tube Overdrive,Roger Mayer Octavia,EH Soul Preacher,Tech 21 XXL Distortion,MFOS Weird Sound Generator.
Location: Darwin,Northern Territory Australia
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 279 times

Post by DrNomis »

noiseuoh wrote:thanks,
ive been aware of the leakage stuff. I think its just been misbiased. Too much info on the mkii to condense. I needed the 10k on r1, a 20k on r3 and a 22k trim on r6. Think i got it sorted with the oc75s. Though still not as much response with the attack as i would like

I actually built a MkII once and the tone was pretty gainy even at minimum attack settings, and it got more saturated when I maxed out the attack... :hmmm:
Genius is not all about 99% perspiration, and 1% inspiration - sometimes the solution is staring you right in the face.-Frequencycentral.

Post Reply