you got a layout to the distortion side?madbean wrote:It's disassembled and on my bench. Effects order switching is simply a 4pdt. All the FETs are 2n5457. It seems a bit over-designed at first glance, with approximately 50 odd resistors and I don't remember how many caps. I will have a preliminary schem, but the Blackstone is first in line.
Should be a straight-forward trace, even for me. There are a few tight places around where the switches are wired, but I'm a persistant d00d.
My initial impression from dinking around with it a few weeks ago was "it's pretty good, but I don't know if it's special". I only spent 30 minutes or so with it. Maybe the trace will reveal some magic or originality???
I'm real curious as to how the boost section compares to the Fat Bastard, if at all....
Fulltone - GT 500
- sevinisthenumber
- Cap Cooler
"The man who says he knows everything will never know the truth"
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
Information
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 18:00
- Contact:
if you all have ideas for mods fulltone gt-500.you all can comment here ..
I opened this topic because of the lack of forums that discuss about this pedal
nb:if any, can be included more pic for more details
I opened this topic because of the lack of forums that discuss about this pedal
nb:if any, can be included more pic for more details
- devastator
- Cap Cooler
Interesting the inductor ! certainly used for the mid section of tonestack.
Information
It's a nice sounding pedal. The basic topology is something similar to Paul Cochrane's Fat Bastard for the boost side, and cascaded mu-amps for the dirt side. I attempted to trace it, but I think it is a 3-layer board. When I had it apart, I could not find some trace connections where they should have been.
I think I have a component list with values somewhere. I can put that up if I find it....things are packed up right now for moving so it will be a while before I can do that. I have more pics, though.
I think I have a component list with values somewhere. I can put that up if I find it....things are packed up right now for moving so it will be a while before I can do that. I have more pics, though.
Information
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 18:00
- Contact:
is there any ideas for mods is the better pedal?
is a good picture
is a good picture
Information
- Posts: 38
- Joined: 07 Jul 2009, 19:14
madbean...
any luck on this schematic?
any luck on this schematic?
Information
I don't have the pedal anymore. I'm pretty sure the PCB is 3 or 4 layers, too, after looking at the bottom side of the board.Saruman wrote:bla bla bla in 4 pages.
If you have a device and you're on this forum, there is no difficult copy schematic????!
I wonder...
Basically, the boost side is really similar to the Fat Bastard, and the gain side is cascaded mu-amps with and inductor for the mids control.
It would be easy to design something very similar
- Dirk_Hendrik
- Old Solderhand
Information
I'm fairly sure it's not.madbean wrote: I don't have the pedal anymore. I'm pretty sure the PCB is 3 or 4 layers, too, after looking at the bottom side of the board.
Information
Dirk_Hendrik wrote:I'm fairly sure it's not.madbean wrote: I don't have the pedal anymore. I'm pretty sure the PCB is 3 or 4 layers, too, after looking at the bottom side of the board.
Why's that? I could be wrong, of course, but it did not seem to have enough traces connecting the components together.
However, just by doing a parts list and looking at how they were placed, it was easy enough to deduce the basic design.
- atreidesheir
- Diode Debunker
Might it not be a good idea to add a good distortion/overdrive to the fat bastard circuit and wire for both with the ability to switch the order. If the distortion is not great in the gt500, why bother really.
Just approach it as an "insert here" type drive.
I was thinking of linking the DOD 250 gray with the fat bastard like this. or maybe the fred briggs overdrive. Something great sounding and not too distinct.
Just approach it as an "insert here" type drive.
I was thinking of linking the DOD 250 gray with the fat bastard like this. or maybe the fred briggs overdrive. Something great sounding and not too distinct.
"Contemplate it - on the tree of woe." :Thulsa Doom
- okgb
- Diode Debunker
A business has to make money to stay in business and be a business, but
how much is a good question ,
The pots thing looks like he also took a page from the mackie book .
maybe all those years of going to the library has got him in the habit of borrowing ?
I'm in for a PaulC preorder of some sort to help support ,
paul, can you make it cash cheques ?
how much is a good question ,
The pots thing looks like he also took a page from the mackie book .
maybe all those years of going to the library has got him in the habit of borrowing ?
I'm in for a PaulC preorder of some sort to help support ,
paul, can you make it cash cheques ?
- sevinisthenumber
- Cap Cooler
Is the boost side of this simply a Fat Bastard?!
"The man who says he knows everything will never know the truth"
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
- MullisMan
- Breadboard Brother
Information
- Posts: 128
- Joined: 23 Feb 2010, 05:22
- my favorite amplifier: Dr. Z Maz 18 Jr.
- Completed builds: Timmy, Klon, Zendrive, King of Tone, Rat, BSIAB2, Riot!, Fuzz Factory, Coloursound Overdriver, Divided by 13 Joyride, 70 Fuzz, BBE Sonic Stomp, Big Muff PI, Xotic EP Booster, Lovepedal Eternity, Jack Orman Minibooster, Dynacomp/Ross/Keeley Compressor, SHO
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
I'm a little confused by the wiring diagram provided by dap9. I see only the toggle 3PDT and not the two 3PDT footswitches that would be used for this application. Do you run a wire from the in on the PCB to the In on the toggle 3PDT and then from that lug on the toggle to whatever lug you're using for the in on the 3PDT footswitch?
Or do I simply run two wires for each in/out on the PCBs to the toggle 3PDT?
Or do I simply run two wires for each in/out on the PCBs to the toggle 3PDT?
I want to build it all.
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 595 times
- Been thanked: 2058 times
a good multimeter
be kind to all animals - especially human beings
FWIW, several things:
1) I have never seen a 3 layer board in 22 years of PCB design. The fab houses I have worked with discourage this, they insist on multiples of 2 layers unless you get a single sided board. This probably has something to do with the available materials to build a board stack with, you want it to be a few mils from 0.062", and it would be hard to do with 3 copper layers.
2) If the board is of a standard multilayer design, look to see which traces disappear in the board. You could start with ground and power traces, these are usually what are run internally. Judging from the pics of the board, there are very short signal trace jumpers present, which most likely would not be on the surface if they run signal traces on an inner layer (at least unless the designer was sloppy or in a big hurry).
3) Also he flooded the visible side of the board with copper pour connected to some net, probably ground, so you won't have any ground traces running around on the board. If you see a via connected directly to the pour area with no wire in it, that means both sides have pour on the same net and they are interconnected (this is normal).
4) Another way to look for a multilayer board is for an isolated via (not attached to a component footprint) that has no wire in it. If a trace goes to the via on one side, and nothing exits or connects on the other side, and the via is not part of an unstuffed component footprint, it probably is a connection to an internal layer. I could not see any such vias in the pics, but there does seem to be a test point on there (which is a via without a connection on one side).
1) I have never seen a 3 layer board in 22 years of PCB design. The fab houses I have worked with discourage this, they insist on multiples of 2 layers unless you get a single sided board. This probably has something to do with the available materials to build a board stack with, you want it to be a few mils from 0.062", and it would be hard to do with 3 copper layers.
2) If the board is of a standard multilayer design, look to see which traces disappear in the board. You could start with ground and power traces, these are usually what are run internally. Judging from the pics of the board, there are very short signal trace jumpers present, which most likely would not be on the surface if they run signal traces on an inner layer (at least unless the designer was sloppy or in a big hurry).
3) Also he flooded the visible side of the board with copper pour connected to some net, probably ground, so you won't have any ground traces running around on the board. If you see a via connected directly to the pour area with no wire in it, that means both sides have pour on the same net and they are interconnected (this is normal).
4) Another way to look for a multilayer board is for an isolated via (not attached to a component footprint) that has no wire in it. If a trace goes to the via on one side, and nothing exits or connects on the other side, and the via is not part of an unstuffed component footprint, it probably is a connection to an internal layer. I could not see any such vias in the pics, but there does seem to be a test point on there (which is a via without a connection on one side).