Harley Benton - PA100 Power Attenuator  [schematic]

All about modern commercial stompbox circuits from Electro Harmonix over MXR, Boss and Ibanez into the nineties.
User avatar
PiZZaMartijn
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 28 Feb 2016, 17:02
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by PiZZaMartijn »

I just got my harley benton power attenuator, it comes with a very confusing manual so I opened it up. Can anybody confirm that this thing can run without a cabinet attached while still using line-out?
Attachments
20160227_0004_0.jpg
20160227_0016_0.jpg
20160227_0022_0.jpg
20160227_0030_0.jpg

User avatar
grrrunge
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 810
Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:51
Completed builds: Loads!
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 207 times
Contact:

Post by grrrunge »

:D Just saw this thing. It looks surprisingly similar to the "Soldano Designed" Jet City attennuator...
http://www.thomann.de/dk/jet_city_ampli ... l_370975_0
A true believer in the magic of Sherwood Forest Pedal Pirates
---
New base of operations: http://www.knucklehead.dk

User avatar
modman
a d m i n
Information
Posts: 4897
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 16:57
Has thanked: 4410 times
Been thanked: 2139 times

Post by modman »

Please, support freestompboxes.org on Patreon for just 1 pcb per year! Or donate directly through PayPal

User avatar
mirosol
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 292
Joined: 11 Mar 2012, 16:15
my favorite amplifier: Been on Bogner for quite some time now.
Completed builds: Over 1000 and counting.
Location: TKU, FI
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 449 times

Post by mirosol »

For the HB's price, that's beginning to look like a proper steal. The rheostat with the same specs (16ohm, 100W) by itself is curretly 78€ plus shipping at mouser. Throw in a few 50W resistors and it's cheaper to buy HB attenuator than the parts to build one like it.

Either way. HB is the same unit as Soldano designed Jet City.
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1224
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Post by phatt »

Regards to no speaker Q;
IF the drawing is correct (and it is not) then yes the resistors are across the load so it would be safe to use without a speaker connected.
The attenuation pot is NOT a normal pot,,hence the name,, L pad.
See the other thread, If I recall? :scratch: I corrected that circuit drawing.
Phil.

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1224
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Post by phatt »

Oh yeah to check;
Just insert a cord into say the 8 Ohm input and you should read low Ohms on the tip and Sleeve of the input cable. (with no speaker connected of course)
As long as it reads below ~30 (ish) Ohms you will be safe. :thumbsup
Phil.

User avatar
gturo
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 30 Oct 2007, 10:39

Post by gturo »

LPAD (made by the italian company CIARE) is an attenuator by itself:
http://www.igtek.it/attenuatore-lpad-ci ... 12582.html
Sorry, the page is in italian... I made my attenuator with two of these in series (in order to shut up a 100W plexi head) and it works well.

User avatar
PiZZaMartijn
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 28 Feb 2016, 17:02
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by PiZZaMartijn »

phatt wrote:Regards to no speaker Q;
IF the drawing is correct (and it is not) then yes the resistors are across the load so it would be safe to use without a speaker connected.
The attenuation pot is NOT a normal pot,,hence the name,, L pad.
See the other thread, If I recall? :scratch: I corrected that circuit drawing.
Phil.
The drawing of the lineout and speaker out part is correct. It just might be different than the jettenuator. The micmod output might have some errors but I'm not using that.

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1224
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Post by phatt »

PiZZaMartijn wrote:
phatt wrote:Regards to no speaker Q;
IF the drawing is correct (and it is not) then yes the resistors are across the load so it would be safe to use without a speaker connected.
The attenuation pot is NOT a normal pot,,hence the name,, L pad.
See the other thread, If I recall? :scratch: I corrected that circuit drawing.
Phil.
The drawing of the lineout and speaker out part is correct. It just might be different than the jettenuator. The micmod output might have some errors but I'm not using that.
Well obviously you did not read the other posting,, :roll: no matter :wink:
Yes your schematic may look perfect but that L pad is not a pot so it's not drawn correctly, therefore,,, it's not right.

A picture might help clear the air; :thumbsup

These Attenuator/ Lpads are a DUAL wire wound pot with a single common wiper. They are configured so that as one turns up , the other turns down.
The idea being to keep the resistance close to 8 Ohms at nearly all points of rotation.
At very low setting (high attenuation) they tend to overheat and often burn out the inside element which is the finer wire. (40 Ohm)

What may be even less obvious is that the Stated 100 Watts is very misleading as these were intended for old style crossover networks where all the low frequency is rolled off and in such a case would only receive mid high frequency signal so the Lpad is not stressed.

In that situation, Yes they can then easy handle 100Watts of system power But asking then to pass full range signal is going burn them out.
That is why those extra resistors are present in the unit as they help to throw off a lot of excess energy and then the Lpad can do the rest without burning out.
Even in such case I would be very wary of over stressing the unit by running high Amplifier volumes with the Attenuator turned down very low. :twisted:
When they get close to burnout point they let off a very strong odor before they blow up,, no medals for guessing how I know that. :D

BTW when turned up to full volume (clockwise) the bottom (40 Ohm track) is then disconnected from the wiper so the signal is then direct with no added resistance back to common.
Hope it helps,,Phil. :thumbsup
Image
free photo upload

Image
image upload without registration

User avatar
PiZZaMartijn
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 28 Feb 2016, 17:02
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by PiZZaMartijn »

What i meant is that in the harley benton attenuator there are also resistors connected to ground while in the jettenuator they are in series with the L-pad.
My amp is only 15 watts so it should handle it. I've used for a while without cab attached in various settings and the outside of the L-pad doesn't even heat up.

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1224
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Post by phatt »

Although there are slight differences, both units have series and parallel resistors in the signal path before the Lpad.
If you are only pushing 15 watts you have no worries. :thumbsup
Phil.

User avatar
spoontex
Information
Posts: 39
Joined: 11 Feb 2014, 22:24

Post by spoontex »

A strange thing happened to me today with my amp and my attenuator. Usually I use an attenuator at home, and sometimes I like to push up the volume for overdrive. And suddenly, it's like the attenuator bypass him... and don't actuate over the amp... I can't regulate the atteunator volume knob, he goes from no sound to a full sound.

Anybody can explain what happen?

User avatar
Manfred
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1944
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
Has thanked: 1675 times
Been thanked: 1359 times

Post by Manfred »

spoontex wrote:A strange thing happened to me today with my amp and my attenuator. Usually I use an attenuator at home, and sometimes I like to push up the volume for overdrive. And suddenly, it's like the attenuator bypass him... and don't actuate over the amp... I can't regulate the atteunator volume knob, he goes from no sound to a full sound.

Anybody can explain what happen?
This is hard to say without further information such as the schematic or wiring diagram.

User avatar
spoontex
Information
Posts: 39
Joined: 11 Feb 2014, 22:24

Post by spoontex »

It's a Harley Benton Power Attenuator. In this web has a schmeatic:

https://blog.brixit.nl/blog/2016/2/harl ... -teardown/

I measured all the amp inputs:

4Ohm:
lpad min: 8.3R
lpad max: 16.6R

8Ohm:
lpad min: 12.3R
lpad max: 20.6R

16Ohm:
lpad min: 16.3R
lpad max: 24.8R

I found that the switched jack from 16R are always open. I replace the jack, and I have this values now:

4Ohm:
lpad min: 4.2R
lpad max: 5.7R

8Ohm:
lpad min: 8.5R
lpad max: 9.8R

16Ohm:
lpad min:16.3R
lpad max: 24.4R

But anyway, this don't attenuate nothing.

User avatar
Manfred
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1944
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
Has thanked: 1675 times
Been thanked: 1359 times

Post by Manfred »

If I recalculate the circuit from the link it will give different values than the one you measured, the schematic might not be correct.
Could you trace the circuit of the damping part of your Attenuator.

User avatar
spoontex
Information
Posts: 39
Joined: 11 Feb 2014, 22:24

Post by spoontex »

I disassembled the lpad and it's burned...

https://ibb.co/rf9GbrP

My amp is a Bassman aa864 50W I can use this Attenuator no?
Attachments
2019-12-9-9-17-6.jpg

User avatar
Manfred
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1944
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
Has thanked: 1675 times
Been thanked: 1359 times

Post by Manfred »

Thanks for the Information.
The attenuator of this kind item is no longer available, what power is the device designed for?
In the article on which the link is referred to a L-Pad power of 100W is mentioned.
But power is voltage times current that says nothing about the maximum allowed current strength
this is determined by the wire diameter of the resistor winding.
Either the L-pad is too weak or there may have been a short circuit at the speaker outputs.

User avatar
spoontex
Information
Posts: 39
Joined: 11 Feb 2014, 22:24

Post by spoontex »

This attenuator is designed to handle 100W power amps. But my amp is 50W. I don't understand why it burned. My amps works normally, seems that nothing is damaged.

User avatar
Manfred
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1944
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
Has thanked: 1675 times
Been thanked: 1359 times

Post by Manfred »

My guess is a Chinese product where the Lpad is too weakly dimensioned.

User avatar
bmxguitarsbmx
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 512
Joined: 25 Mar 2010, 21:15
Has thanked: 705 times
Been thanked: 216 times

Post by bmxguitarsbmx »

I have read that, because L-pads are typically designed to balance the level of the tweeter to the woofer, the 100watt rating is specified as the rating for the speaker system. Maybe measuring the diameter of the resistance wire could give a realistic idea of power handling. I do know that I immediately smoked this 100watt l-pad with a 20Watt amp. I wouldn't say it sounded all that great either (for obvious reasons).

https://www.parts-express.com/parts-exp ... m--260-261

Post Reply