Earthquaker Devices - Disaster Transport JR [traced]
- batteryacidtea
- Breadboard Brother
Nice! How do you like it? I'm really interested in understanding how does the tone control works here!
- bugg
- Breadboard Brother
- marshmellow
- Cap Cooler
Ever since the Rebote every PT2399 Delay has to suffer from this nonsensical input stage design. Everybody just copies it again and again without wasting a single thought
.

- jrfox92
- Breadboard Brother
Information
- Posts: 70
- Joined: 11 Jun 2014, 04:46
- Completed builds: Death by Audio Fuzz War
Electro-Harmonix Big Muff Pi V5
Skreddy Lunar Module
Colorsound Overdriver
Electro-Harmonix Big Muff Pi Multi-Diode and Feedback Mod
Electro-Harmonix Holy Grail Room Reverb and Reverb Length Mod
Boss DS-1 Synth Circuit Bend - Location: Akron, Ohio
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
marshmellow wrote:Ever since the Rebote every PT2399 Delay has to suffer from this nonsensical input stage design. Everybody just copies it again and again without wasting a single thought.



What's nonsensical about it?
Do you just have a problem with input buffers?
The only difference between the Rebote and the data sheet (from what I remember) is a Jfet boost at the input.
- marshmellow
- Cap Cooler
That's not a buffer, that's a noise generator with a NF in excess of 20dB. For a unity gain stage that is just ridiculous (and copied blindly by Mad Professor, Wampler, several Madbean designs, many DIY variations, ...). An inverting stage as a high-impedance input is simply wrong. You either have low impedance, or high noise, choose your poison. The way to go is to use a non-inverting buffer and don't care about the polarity inversion. Which is a bit schizophrenic in the first place considering that 99% of other effects don't care a single bit about this issue. Or you put a JFET/BJT buffer in front of it and decrease the resistors to 10k.
Or you build something that was properly designed from the beginning, like the PT80, the original PT2399 design, or Dirk's contest entry.
Or you build something that was properly designed from the beginning, like the PT80, the original PT2399 design, or Dirk's contest entry.
- phatt
- Transistor Tuner
marshmellow wrote:That's not a buffer, that's a noise generator with a NF in excess of 20dB. For a unity gain stage that is just ridiculous (and copied blindly by Mad Professor, Wampler, several Madbean designs, many DIY variations, ...). An inverting stage as a high-impedance input is simply wrong. You either have low impedance, or high noise, choose your poison. The way to go is to use a non-inverting buffer and don't care about the polarity inversion. Which is a bit schizophrenic in the first place considering that 99% of other effects don't care a single bit about this issue. Or you put a JFET/BJT buffer in front of it and decrease the resistors to 10k.
Or you build something that was properly designed from the beginning, like the PT80, the original PT2399 design, or Dirk's contest entry.






Take Marshamellow's advice,, print that out in RED Bold and refer to it everytime you build a pedal.
You don't need noise gates and other crap if you build them properly,,, jezz the front end of a TS9 with BJT would out perform in a noise shoot out.
Noise is the hidden enemy in pedal design and easy to get caught as it's not obvious to the novice.
Phil.
- snk
- Resistor Ronker
Hello
I built and EQD Disaster Transport JR and i like it.
I also started studying other PT2399 designs, and found the Hamlet Delay, where (among other things) it is suggested to put a green LED from PT2399 pin7 to ground in order to avoid clipping the PT2399 input.
Did anyone try it on the Disaster Transport JR ? Would it work the same way ?
I built and EQD Disaster Transport JR and i like it.
I also started studying other PT2399 designs, and found the Hamlet Delay, where (among other things) it is suggested to put a green LED from PT2399 pin7 to ground in order to avoid clipping the PT2399 input.
Did anyone try it on the Disaster Transport JR ? Would it work the same way ?
- bc108
- Breadboard Brother
I'm thinking in build this one into a small veroboard, and add before some Echoplex Preamp.
Is this one more "lo-fi" compared to Deep Blue, or Wampler Faux?
Is this one more "lo-fi" compared to Deep Blue, or Wampler Faux?
- jeepe
- Breadboard Brother
Information
- Posts: 66
- Joined: 10 Jun 2019, 16:48
- Completed builds: I might be at level 2, so to speak..
not totally green, but that's all :)
my "level" is about building a big muff... medium complexity :)
I'll never build a DS-2, for example :)
- -
even though I'm a layman to electronics
I'll never build anything without seeing the actual schematics too...
- -
my all time favorite: Fuzz FAce
it is an always ongoing project..
- -
I want to end up strumming some strings at the end of the day, whatever the sound
- -
I'm so sad that this beautiful culture (and freedom movement) is totally ephemeral - Location: Budaspest, Europe
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
hi,
at tagboardeffectlayouts, Servant07 had spotted an error in the "pedalpcb schematic"...
in this thread: https://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/20 ... rt-jr.html
Servant07 3 January 2018 at 07:11
Finished troubleshooting on paper, didn't have time to make the changes to my build tonight, but I think I got it with shifting a few parts around. The main things are that R12(47K at IC2 pin 15) on the PedalPCB schematic is missing, and the 10uF above IC2 should go from pin 5 of IC1 to ground (right now its connected to ground on both ends).
(Only the bold part of the message refers to the schematic)
PS:
he also uploaded a vero layout link:
Servant07 4 January 2018 at 05:06
Got it working tonight. Unfortunately I had to add an extra column for the missing resistor at column 17. Here is a link to the new 23 column wide layout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/lgvctnhdtqyfmpw/DTJ.png?dl=0
at tagboardeffectlayouts, Servant07 had spotted an error in the "pedalpcb schematic"...
in this thread: https://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/20 ... rt-jr.html
Servant07 3 January 2018 at 07:11
Finished troubleshooting on paper, didn't have time to make the changes to my build tonight, but I think I got it with shifting a few parts around. The main things are that R12(47K at IC2 pin 15) on the PedalPCB schematic is missing, and the 10uF above IC2 should go from pin 5 of IC1 to ground (right now its connected to ground on both ends).
(Only the bold part of the message refers to the schematic)
PS:
he also uploaded a vero layout link:
Servant07 4 January 2018 at 05:06
Got it working tonight. Unfortunately I had to add an extra column for the missing resistor at column 17. Here is a link to the new 23 column wide layout: https://www.dropbox.com/s/lgvctnhdtqyfmpw/DTJ.png?dl=0
pedal building, tracing and sharing is such a beautiful freedom movement... If only it could be viewed as a future heritage, but it really is ephemeral, as it seems