Wampler - Faux Spring Reverb
- apollomusicservice
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- IvIark
- Tube Twister
Information
You are on fire dude
Really good work I must say
Hope there's more coming
Really good work I must say
Hope there's more coming
"If anyone is a 'genius' for putting jacks in such a pedal in the only spot where they could physically fit, then I assume I too am a genius for correctly inserting my legs into my pants this morning." - candletears7 - TGP
- Jack Deville
- Resistor Ronker
Information
Why are there two identical split-supplies?
Why is a direct-coupled opamp input tied to a second half-supply?
Why is such a high value resistor used?
Why is the unused opamp input tied to ground?
Why not use this unused opamp to stabilize the lossy tone control of the circuit and eliminate the circuit's variable output impedance?
Why are there redundant decoupling capacitors?
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY?
Is the trace good? I'm not doubting whoever traced it, I'm just confused by these "design decisions."
Why is a direct-coupled opamp input tied to a second half-supply?
Why is such a high value resistor used?
Why is the unused opamp input tied to ground?
Why not use this unused opamp to stabilize the lossy tone control of the circuit and eliminate the circuit's variable output impedance?
Why are there redundant decoupling capacitors?
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY?
Is the trace good? I'm not doubting whoever traced it, I'm just confused by these "design decisions."
- jymaze
- Resistor Ronker
Thanks for that trace, but there has to be some mistakes: The depth pot won't act as supposed, and the tone pot won't work much either.
I am pretty sure IC2B is a summator too. It would make more sense (it would be R9 goes to 6, R19 goes to 6, R15 is in the feedback loop, R10 still goes to 5 and now makes sense at this place).
For the tone I think C10 goes to ground, after the tone pot.
The depth pot somehow should loop around the Belton brick.
I may try to retrace from the pictures. If you have more of them,can you please post? In particular under the pots of course...
I am pretty sure IC2B is a summator too. It would make more sense (it would be R9 goes to 6, R19 goes to 6, R15 is in the feedback loop, R10 still goes to 5 and now makes sense at this place).
For the tone I think C10 goes to ground, after the tone pot.
The depth pot somehow should loop around the Belton brick.
I may try to retrace from the pictures. If you have more of them,can you please post? In particular under the pots of course...
- Frabbio
- Breadboard Brother
I guess the identical split-supplies are used to limit interferences between different sections of the circuit, but apart from this i think there are some errors in the trace.Jack Deville wrote:Why are there two identical split-supplies?
Why is a direct-coupled opamp input tied to a second half-supply?
Why is such a high value resistor used?
Why is the unused opamp input tied to ground?
Why not use this unused opamp to stabilize the lossy tone control of the circuit and eliminate the circuit's variable output impedance?
Why are there redundant decoupling capacitors?
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY?
Is the trace good? I'm not doubting whoever traced it, I'm just confused by these "design decisions."
I will revisit
Sorry for any errors
Thanks for your patience.
Sorry for any errors
Thanks for your patience.
- Beedoola
- Resistor Ronker
So I bought a Faux Reverb and I took it apart and as far as I can tell, this schematic is correct.
One thing; the label in the brick has been removed. Any guesses on what is used for this circuit?
I'm going to order the parts soon and breadboard it to confirm.
Thanks.
One thing; the label in the brick has been removed. Any guesses on what is used for this circuit?
I'm going to order the parts soon and breadboard it to confirm.
Thanks.
- indyguitarist
- Resistor Ronker
will-scarlet wrote:The sounds of surf rock
Like Dick Dale would always play
Cowabunga, dude
Please don't build them that way. That output is wack.
edit: a closer look... from the depth pot forward is messed. It's not too far off from the mixing section of the datasheet. Building the circuit as shown here won't sound anything like the FSR.
- Mbas974
- Resistor Ronker
I built my reverb using all the goods I found on web.
Looking around all BTDR built are close but not equlals.
80% is Faux design and the rest is from other (like feedback from GGG).
Brian, you're right the schematic on beginning of topics is NOT the Faux. In your design why do not use half TL for feedback ( it makes the reverbs like shimmering ) ?
Anyhow, I called it the "CRASTER REVERB", feel free to built it, and mod it as per your personal taste. ( This is NOT the Wampler clone !! )
Ciao !!
Looking around all BTDR built are close but not equlals.
80% is Faux design and the rest is from other (like feedback from GGG).
Brian, you're right the schematic on beginning of topics is NOT the Faux. In your design why do not use half TL for feedback ( it makes the reverbs like shimmering ) ?
Anyhow, I called it the "CRASTER REVERB", feel free to built it, and mod it as per your personal taste. ( This is NOT the Wampler clone !! )
Ciao !!
- alexradium
- Resistor Ronker
i don't get why people pretend to be smarter than they really are,publishing schematics obviously wrong from a technical point of view,its happened many times here and in the end the original builder gets it in the a$$ because hundreds of people build the pedal the wrong way and come out on boards saying that sucks big time.indyguitarist wrote:will-scarlet wrote:The sounds of surf rock
Like Dick Dale would always play
Cowabunga, dude
Please don't build them that way. That output is wack.
edit: a closer look... from the depth pot forward is messed. It's not too far off from the mixing section of the datasheet. Building the circuit as shown here won't sound anything like the FSR.
- indyguitarist
- Resistor Ronker
Maybe I misunderstand, but I'm not trying pretend to be smarter or anything, I just don't want people to say the pedal sucks after trying a DIY version. I also know that half of the fun is putting the puzzle pieces together of a design, so I offered some insight into what was wrong.alexradium wrote:i don't get why people pretend to be smarter than they really are,publishing schematics obviously wrong from a technical point of view,its happened many times here and in the end the original builder gets it in the a$$ because hundreds of people build the pedal the wrong way and come out on boards saying that sucks big time.indyguitarist wrote:will-scarlet wrote:The sounds of surf rock
Like Dick Dale would always play
Cowabunga, dude
Please don't build them that way. That output is wack.
edit: a closer look... from the depth pot forward is messed. It's not too far off from the mixing section of the datasheet. Building the circuit as shown here won't sound anything like the FSR.
- alexradium
- Resistor Ronker
I wasn't referring to you,Brian,you are SMART enough to make your businesses in a good way,for sure.
- indyguitarist
- Resistor Ronker
Look at the application circuit on page 3 of this pdf:Beedoola wrote:I think I fixed the output...
https://www.smallbearelec.com/Projects/BTDR-1H.pdf
hint: Notice the last opamp stage. That can be turned into a low pass filter very easily.
You are close, but still not there.