D*style distortion/OD [traced]
- box
- Breadboard Brother
Hi,
link to the tube-ish distortion:
https://www.diystompboxes.com/pedals/sc ... panova.pdf
Just change : D1-12V Zener,C2-4u7, C4-47nF,C7-47nF,add resistor 47k between Drive 1 and Gnd,R15-15k,C13-33nF,R16-3k9
Q1-D=5.17V,G=0V, S=0.825V
Q2-D=6.58V, G=6.58V,S=0.482V
Q3-D=7.27V , S=0.271V
Q4-B=7.28V,E=6.64V, C=9.05V
Enjoy .
Rgds,
box
link to the tube-ish distortion:
https://www.diystompboxes.com/pedals/sc ... panova.pdf
Just change : D1-12V Zener,C2-4u7, C4-47nF,C7-47nF,add resistor 47k between Drive 1 and Gnd,R15-15k,C13-33nF,R16-3k9
Q1-D=5.17V,G=0V, S=0.825V
Q2-D=6.58V, G=6.58V,S=0.482V
Q3-D=7.27V , S=0.271V
Q4-B=7.28V,E=6.64V, C=9.05V
Enjoy .
Rgds,
box
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1675 times
- Been thanked: 1360 times
Hi Box,
did you select the J201 Fets for this circuit?
did you select the J201 Fets for this circuit?
- Dirk_Hendrik
- Old Solderhand
Information
Thanks.
How much influence does including that C10-R10 really have?
How much influence does including that C10-R10 really have?
- Ripdivot
- Resistor Ronker
I have the same question. R10 seems like it's not correct, 10meg is way too high. Seems like 10k would make more sense.Dirk_Hendrik wrote:Thanks.
How much influence does including that C10-R10 really have?
- box
- Breadboard Brother
Guys,Ripdivot wrote:I have the same question. R10 seems like it's not correct, 10meg is way too high. Seems like 10k would make more sense.Dirk_Hendrik wrote:Thanks.
How much influence does including that C10-R10 really have?
if do you compare original schematic and some changes you can notice that C10-R10 left without any change.
Always you can experiment to choose the best sound for you.
Rgds,
box
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1675 times
- Been thanked: 1360 times
Hi Box,box wrote:Hi,Manfred wrote:Hi Box,
did you select the J201 Fets for this circuit?
no I didn't select. Just adjust value of the voltage.
Rgds,
box
thanks!
How did you make the setting, by listen to achive the best overdrive sound
or e.g. by oscilloscop to get a symmetrical clipping?
Rgds,
Manfred
- box
- Breadboard Brother
Hi Box,Manfred wrote:box wrote:Hi,Manfred wrote:Hi Box,
did you select the J201 Fets for this circuit?
no I didn't select. Just adjust value of the voltage.
Rgds,
box
thanks!
How did you make the setting, by listen to achive the best overdrive sound
or e.g. by oscilloscop to get a symmetrical clipping?
Rgds,
Manfred
Hi Manfred,
You are wlcme.Please try first to follow voltage adjustment but if you are not happy with this next step to achive the best overdrive sound.
Rgds,
box
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1675 times
- Been thanked: 1360 times
Hi Box,
thanks again!
The frist step will be to build the device,
then I will follow the setting procedure as you recommended.
Rgds
Manfred
thanks again!
The frist step will be to build the device,
then I will follow the setting procedure as you recommended.
Rgds
Manfred
- Dirk_Hendrik
- Old Solderhand
Information
Uuh,box wrote:Guys,Ripdivot wrote:I have the same question. R10 seems like it's not correct, 10meg is way too high. Seems like 10k would make more sense.Dirk_Hendrik wrote:Thanks.
How much influence does including that C10-R10 really have?
if do you compare original schematic and some changes you can notice that C10-R10 left without any change.
Always you can experiment to choose the best sound for you.
Rgds,
box
Scuse me for being ignorant and apparently at a wrong wavelength and somehow missing something. What I see is a .pdf with a schem and build instructions. Therefore;
- which original schematic?
- which "some changes"
And asking questions on questionnable parts of a circuit does not mean "can I experiment?" It means "What was you motivation for doing this?".
- box
- Breadboard Brother
Hi,Dirk_Hendrik wrote:Uuh,box wrote:Guys,Ripdivot wrote:I have the same question. R10 seems like it's not correct, 10meg is way too high. Seems like 10k would make more sense.Dirk_Hendrik wrote:Thanks.
How much influence does including that C10-R10 really have?
if do you compare original schematic and some changes you can notice that C10-R10 left without any change.
Always you can experiment to choose the best sound for you.
Rgds,
box
Scuse me for being ignorant and apparently at a wrong wavelength and somehow missing something. What I see is a .pdf with a schem and build instructions. Therefore;
- which original schematic?
- which "some changes"
And asking questions on questionnable parts of a circuit does not mean "can I experiment?" It means "What was you motivation for doing this?".
original schematic is the one in the first post pdf and build instruction. My modification some of the components it's mention below the link.
If schematic was already published on the net I can't see any restriction to modify and motivation is always the same "to achieve sound according
my requirement"- similar to D*mble.
Most important that there is no claim that it's my design .Demo it's very close sound what I get it .
I hope so that no more explaination is required
Rgds,
box
- Dirk_Hendrik
- Old Solderhand
Information
OK I' get it now.
Bottom line is that apparently Nagy published this design and so far nobody (googled) ever wondered about this oddity in the circuit.
Or is this one of these add-on's in hope to be one of these "and I added bullshit to the design and they just copied it in their clone" bullshitters?
Bottom line is that apparently Nagy published this design and so far nobody (googled) ever wondered about this oddity in the circuit.
Or is this one of these add-on's in hope to be one of these "and I added bullshit to the design and they just copied it in their clone" bullshitters?
- box
- Breadboard Brother
blah blahDirk_Hendrik wrote:OK I' get it now.
Bottom line is that apparently Nagy published this design and so far nobody (googled) ever wondered about this oddity in the circuit.
Or is this one of these add-on's in hope to be one of these "and I added bullshit to the design and they just copied it in their clone" bullshitters?
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1675 times
- Been thanked: 1360 times
Hi,Manfred wrote:Hi Box,
thanks again!
The frist step will be to build the device,
then I will follow the setting procedure as you recommended.
Rgds
Manfred
have a look at the article there:
http://runoffgroove.com/fetzervalve.html
The article contains a Vp and Idd measuring circuit.
at the end of the page apears an online JFET stage calculator
to determine the stage parts values depends on Vp and Idd.
Rgds
Manfred