Pinnacle/Sovereign - to much sag

Forum dedicated to helping people debug and troubleshoot non-functional pedals or builds. Please use an clear and informative title, indicating circuit and basic problem. Don't forget to mark the issue as fixed if this is the case.
Post Reply
User avatar
maoriente
Information
Posts: 28
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 18:02
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by maoriente »

As I understand it, high output pickups can cause to much sag with the Pinnacle and/or Sovereign.

Brian's suggestion (a few years ago) was to lower that guitar's pickup height.

What would be the best approach to simulating lowering the pickup height, by limiting the input signal without killing the pedal's response?

Would any of these "mods" accomplish this? (using a switch)
Lower the impedance to the 1st jfet? (R28)
Increase the 470R input resistor value? (R2) Maybe with a treble bypass cap paralleled?

Any other way(s) to do it?
Previously Posted Schematic

User avatar
Satch12879
Information
Posts: 17
Joined: 08 Jun 2010, 23:41
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by Satch12879 »

Increase the supply voltage.

User avatar
maoriente
Information
Posts: 28
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 18:02
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by maoriente »

Thanks Satch, sorry I should have mentioned I already tried a charge pump 9v/18v "sag" switch, did not resolve the low end clipping.

User avatar
brejna
Breadboard Brother
Information
Posts: 116
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 17:14
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 61 times

Post by brejna »

Few years ago I had same problem with the pinnacle build, so so I increased input resistor. In your case R2, if I remember correctly I changed it with the 33k

User avatar
maoriente
Information
Posts: 28
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 18:02
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by maoriente »

Cool, thanks brejna, will try that next.

I'll switch in a 33k between the 470R and 22n cap.

BTW, the low end "splat" only happens when attacking the strings hard.

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1217
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Post by phatt »

You can halve the value of C4 for less bass and lower values of C3 may also be needed.
Lower values of both might be needed. Higher values of R3 and R9 will back off the gain.
Phil.

User avatar
maoriente
Information
Posts: 28
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 18:02
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by maoriente »

Thanks Phatt!

Had tried 10n for C4 and removing C3 all together. Neither helped with the "splat" itself.

And it happens in the lower gain switch setting too, when R3 and R9 are not engaged.

I've also swapped jfets, socketed and tried other values for every coupling cap. Nothing helped with the low end "extra" sag. (again, only happens when digging in on the low strings)

After all I have tried and read, I'm pretty much convinced the issue is with the input signal level.

Just don't know the best way to tame the input strength (when using high output pickups) without effecting the pedal's tone or response.

per brenja's suggestion, I'm going to put in a temporary pot (wired as an adjustable resistor) between the 470R and 22n input cap to see if I can dial out the splat without killing the response or tone. I'll also try a treble "bleed" resistor across the two lugs if needed.

Also, I forgot I had already tried lowering the input impedance on another build, which killed the pedal's response.

Hoping someone else has had this same issue and found a fix other than lowering the pickup height. (And maybe brenja already has the answer)

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1217
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Post by phatt »

OK then try lower values for C5.
I did build a similar circuit long ago and I do recall C5 was lowered to wipe off bass.
You can do same at C9 if needed.
You can also try half values for R5 & R6,,
C6 is another place you can lower to wipe off even more low end.
Like a lot of these circuits you really have to fine tune the response to the rig you have.
Phil.

User avatar
bmxguitarsbmx
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 472
Joined: 25 Mar 2010, 21:15
Has thanked: 657 times
Been thanked: 203 times

Post by bmxguitarsbmx »

Drop C6 to 2.2nF. Or even 1nF. That's what I would do.

C5 can give you weird transient response. I would be tempted to just put that at 1uF and not use it to limit low end. While C5 does limit low end, it also creates transient instability the lower the value is. I.e. it's not simply a first order filter. YMMV

User avatar
maoriente
Information
Posts: 28
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 18:02
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by maoriente »

Thanks BMX, will give that a try. And thanks for correcting the too too :0)

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1217
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Post by phatt »

bmxguitarsbmx wrote:Drop C6 to 2.2nF. Or even 1nF. That's what I would do.

C5 can give you weird transient response. I would be tempted to just put that at 1uF and not use it to limit low end. While C5 does limit low end, it also creates transient instability the lower the value is. I.e. it's not simply a first order filter. YMMV
Ta mate,, good catch. :slap: Now that you mention it, I recall weird thing happening with small values for C5 but long time ago so all a bit vague now.
Phil.

Post Reply