didnt spot as I built mine on vero. thanks for all the tips, but I didnt have the problems others had, mine worked ok
Demeter - Tremulator
-
Torchy
Information
lmkv15 - thanks, missed that one
didnt spot as I built mine on vero. thanks for all the tips, but I didnt have the problems others had, mine worked ok
didnt spot as I built mine on vero. thanks for all the tips, but I didnt have the problems others had, mine worked ok
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Hi Torchy - didn't have any problems building mine - just my simulations were weird - I will recheck them again - still puzzled about those 4.3v zeners though. Can anyone confirm they are correct
Cheers
Steve
Cheers
Steve
- invictus
- Breadboard Brother
bajaman wrote:Thank you lmkv15
I also took Invictus's advice but connected the pilot light led with 4.7k in series to pin 6 of the LF351 - I rerouted the red wire from the 3 pole switch and soldered directly to pin 6 on the board![]()
Cheers
bajaman
ooops...yeah, pin6 should be better point to connect it... gotta edit that one. another better thing to do is to attach the negative side of the LED to the 3PDT where it could connect to ground when the circuit is active, then disconnect ( LED OFF) when in bypass mode..
i'll try to edit the schematic and post it here for those who could use it..
.
"im the master of my fate, im the captain of my soul... " -invictus
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Hi Invictus - I was going to switch the earth end too, but got lazy and just moved the red wire from +9v to pin 6 - it doesn't click or thump when switched
bajaman
bajaman
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Hi folks
I ran some more simulations and I am now getting a perfect triangle wave oscillator - not lopsided or with rounded edges etc
Also the zeners have no effect on the simulated waveform or the physical implementation of this schematic - save your money and leave them out
bajaman
I ran some more simulations and I am now getting a perfect triangle wave oscillator - not lopsided or with rounded edges etc
Also the zeners have no effect on the simulated waveform or the physical implementation of this schematic - save your money and leave them out
bajaman
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Hello again
I have re-designed the Demeter oscillator section of the tremulator schematic posted by Torchy, which is just a badly designed triangle wave.
First - I simulated the schaller oscillator in markm's heart throb tremelo, and found it to be a lot similar in design to the classic Fender 12AX7 oscillator (phase shift oscillator type), but realised with an NPN bipolar transistor. However the sine wave function is not very clean and I suspect it cuts the transistor off on it's negative sweep - SO - I simulated an opamp version which gave a very clean sine wave, BUT needed a triple ganged pot to shift the frequency of oscillation.
OKAY - I googled and came up with a National Semiconductors application note using LM101 and LM111 devices.
After several hours simulating and adjusting this, I came up with a damn near perfect pure sine wave oscillator that only requires a single ganged 50k linear pot to tune from slow to super fast.
Armed with this new oscillator schematic, I attacked the demeter board, cutting and moving tracks and replacing components etc.
I retained the LF 442 op amp and reduced the gain of the led driver that follows the oscillator to 13dB (was 27dB).
I plugged my guitar in and WOW, this tremelo is smooth as
No sign of any choppiness or uneven - sounds almost like a leslie on very fast setting ( which is something I will be using this oscillator in in future
)
I wonder if I should give Ry Cooder a phone call
ANYWAY - Enough raving - I will redraw the board layout and schematic etc. and post for all to build in the next few days - YOU will like it much better than the Heart Throb or stock Demeter versions.
Stay tuned
bajaman
I have re-designed the Demeter oscillator section of the tremulator schematic posted by Torchy, which is just a badly designed triangle wave.
First - I simulated the schaller oscillator in markm's heart throb tremelo, and found it to be a lot similar in design to the classic Fender 12AX7 oscillator (phase shift oscillator type), but realised with an NPN bipolar transistor. However the sine wave function is not very clean and I suspect it cuts the transistor off on it's negative sweep - SO - I simulated an opamp version which gave a very clean sine wave, BUT needed a triple ganged pot to shift the frequency of oscillation.
OKAY - I googled and came up with a National Semiconductors application note using LM101 and LM111 devices.
After several hours simulating and adjusting this, I came up with a damn near perfect pure sine wave oscillator that only requires a single ganged 50k linear pot to tune from slow to super fast.
Armed with this new oscillator schematic, I attacked the demeter board, cutting and moving tracks and replacing components etc.
I retained the LF 442 op amp and reduced the gain of the led driver that follows the oscillator to 13dB (was 27dB).
I plugged my guitar in and WOW, this tremelo is smooth as
I wonder if I should give Ry Cooder a phone call
ANYWAY - Enough raving - I will redraw the board layout and schematic etc. and post for all to build in the next few days - YOU will like it much better than the Heart Throb or stock Demeter versions.
Stay tuned
bajaman
- Kaos
- Breadboard Brother
The camel is a horse designed by a committee that never met.
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
No - but I had seen that one - far too complicated
bajaman
the application note is National Semiconductor Linear Brief LB-16 from March 1971 (figure 1), but I warn you now - I have changed it significantly - just a good place to start - be patient I am redrawing the board layout and schematic at present.
cheers
bajaman
bajaman
the application note is National Semiconductor Linear Brief LB-16 from March 1971 (figure 1), but I warn you now - I have changed it significantly - just a good place to start - be patient I am redrawing the board layout and schematic at present.
cheers
bajaman
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
- Goop_buster
- Solder Soldier
Great stuff bajaman, thanks ! 
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Hi Goopbuster - you are most welcome friend.
i plan to use this oscillator in an upcoming rotary speaker simulator - but don't hold your breath, other things to do first.
Try it out - i think you will like what you hear
cheers
bajaman
i plan to use this oscillator in an upcoming rotary speaker simulator - but don't hold your breath, other things to do first.
Try it out - i think you will like what you hear
cheers
bajaman
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Here is the printed circuit board track layout for my Baja Trembulator
( board placement to follow soon )
enjoy
bajaman
Baja Trembulator Tracks
( board placement to follow soon )
enjoy
bajaman
Baja Trembulator Tracks
Last edited by bajaman on 02 Aug 2007, 08:19, edited 1 time in total.
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
- invictus
- Breadboard Brother
.
.
superb job bajaman! thanks for this..
any suggestion for a good replacements for the LFXXX ICs? i want to try your creation. but i dont have any LFXXX ic here.
is your perfect sinewave oscillator (PSO? ) strictly designed for LFXXX IC?
.
.
.
superb job bajaman! thanks for this..
any suggestion for a good replacements for the LFXXX ICs? i want to try your creation. but i dont have any LFXXX ic here.
is your perfect sinewave oscillator (PSO? ) strictly designed for LFXXX IC?
.
.
"im the master of my fate, im the captain of my soul... " -invictus
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
ANY dual opamp will do - TL072 works fine and even a 4558 of any manufacturer will work.
Eventually I will redesign for a TL074 quad opamp to do the lot
You can use pretty well anything in here - experiment - use IC sockets etc.
I made my own optocoupler - see previous post in this thread.
cheers
bajaman
Eventually I will redesign for a TL074 quad opamp to do the lot
You can use pretty well anything in here - experiment - use IC sockets etc.
I made my own optocoupler - see previous post in this thread.
cheers
bajaman
- Goop_buster
- Solder Soldier
Thanks a lot bajaman
.
What (frequency) is the slowest setting on that oscillator?
What (frequency) is the slowest setting on that oscillator?
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Slow as you would ever need - if you change the 50k lin pot for a 500k lin you will get very sloooooow speeeed
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
ALSO if you want to get it running ridiculously fast lower or short out the 10k resistor in series with the rate (speed) pot.
You may like to put a 20k trim pot ( replace 18k) in the feedback loop of the LF351 ( or TL071) etc., to adjust the optocoupler light intensity also.
cheers
bajaman - falling asleep - 1:13am here - yawn - back tomorrow ( or later on today)
You may like to put a 20k trim pot ( replace 18k) in the feedback loop of the LF351 ( or TL071) etc., to adjust the optocoupler light intensity also.
cheers
bajaman - falling asleep - 1:13am here - yawn - back tomorrow ( or later on today)