No more PCB's

Frequently asked question on the subject of designing, creating, producing printed boards, veroboards or perfboads and on point-to-point construction techniques.
Post Reply
User avatar
Duckman
Opamp Operator
Information
Posts: 1492
Joined: 20 May 2009, 01:45
Has thanked: 320 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post by Duckman »

Ok, maybe a little exagerated, but here's the case:

I always liked all that point-to-point stuff, but you always got to deal with something else than the pure components, so I figured out how to use only components.
I'm experimenting with this yet and maybe is too soon to put it on the table, but also want to share and recieve some input about.
A simple concept: two parallel solid wires, one for power and one for ground and all the stuff in between.
Pro's? no drilling, no chemichal waste, no copper, no printing P'n'P, easy to design and may be others.
Con's? complicated (kinda ship in a bottle work), wierdo look, hard to repair, every component needs to be fitted and may be others too.
My first attemp, a Civil War Big Muff, looks like shit, but I got a good feeling about all this.
No photos yet or sound clips, but some designs to start.
Shoot to the head.
Attachments
RAT ON 2 WIRES.gif
DISTORTION+ ON 2 WIRES.gif
DISTORTION+ ON 2 WIRES.gif (16.25 KiB) Viewed 1259 times
BIG MUFF ON 2 WIRES.gif

User avatar
madbean
Information

Post by madbean »

Looks like a solid enough technique to me. Basically you are marrying perf and vero this way with the two strips. And, following the schemes more or less for the layout makes it pretty easy.

User avatar
p_wats
Breadboard Brother
Information
Posts: 73
Joined: 07 Jan 2009, 00:53
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by p_wats »

I've done some really simple circuits this way (Bazz Fuss, Easy Drive). It's a lot of fun!

User avatar
Duckman
Opamp Operator
Information
Posts: 1492
Joined: 20 May 2009, 01:45
Has thanked: 320 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post by Duckman »

madbean wrote:Looks like a solid enough technique to me. Basically you are marrying perf and vero this way with the two strips. And, following the schemes more or less for the layout makes it pretty easy.
Thanks for the approach, and yes, you're right. In fact, it's cuasi a direct translation from the schem, like the Big Muff. I'm trying to keep it solid without over bending leads, just a little angle in the cross points and let the solder do the work. Also trying to improve a floating system, with some spongey material, but direct solder to jacks (IN, OUT and 9v, à la Frequencycentral) seems to be the best option

User avatar
Hides-His-Eyes
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 12:34
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Post by Hides-His-Eyes »

Do it on a piece of card, and then you can burn off the card afterwards! Genius.
Testing, testing, won too fwee

User avatar
Duckman
Opamp Operator
Information
Posts: 1492
Joined: 20 May 2009, 01:45
Has thanked: 320 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post by Duckman »

p_wats wrote:I've done some really simple circuits this way (Bazz Fuss, Easy Drive). It's a lot of fun!
Yes, seems to be a logic choice when you got just a few components, right?
When parts tend to raise, is like a jewerly work :lol:

User avatar
Duckman
Opamp Operator
Information
Posts: 1492
Joined: 20 May 2009, 01:45
Has thanked: 320 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post by Duckman »

Hides-His-Eyes wrote:Do it on a piece of card, and then you can burn off the card afterwards! Genius.
:lol: Genius!

I tryied that (without fire, just rip it) but it's more problematic than it seems. In certain point, you need to work in both sides.
'Till now, my best option was start with some group of parts that cross the hole pattern, from 9+ to ground and then add the rest.

Post Reply