Page 1 of 1
Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 23 Dec 2010, 11:31
by ~arph
Hi,
I'm building some mammoths, with improved tonestacks.
Here's the schematic I'll be using. Kudo's to the creator of the James stack. I don't know who it is, but I think I first saw it in the James Muff and the SFT. It must go way back though..
The output buffer is also from the James muff.
Merry christmas!
Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 01 Jan 2011, 21:56
by soggybag
Great idea, I had just been planning a Woolly Mammoth with a BMP tone control.
I'm guessing that R5,6 is a pot and R9 and R10 is another pot.
Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 02 Jan 2011, 04:02
by oldgravity
~arph wrote:Here's the schematic I'll be using. Kudo's to the creator of the James stack. I don't know who it is, it must go way back though..
The James is the passive version of the Baxandall tone control - I believe it's so named because Peter J. Baxandall's middle name was James. So this would be from the 1950s.
Here's the original paper:
http://home.comcast.net/~stphkeri/Negat ... ckTone.pdf
Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 02 Jan 2011, 11:20
by ~arph
Yes R5,6 and R9,10 are pots
also note that the "Wool" control is missing from the schematic. There should be a 2kB pot between the negative side of C3 and GND
Plus to tame the noise I got when built, I placed a 220pF between the base and collector of Q1
Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 04 Jan 2011, 19:47
by oldgravity
oldgravity wrote:
The James is the passive version of the Baxandall tone control - I believe it's so named because Peter J. Baxandall's middle name was James. So this would be from the 1950s.
Here's the original paper:
http://home.comcast.net/~stphkeri/Negat ... ckTone.pdf
Nope, I was wrong. The James is by E.J. James, and here's his original article:
http://home.comcast.net/~stphkeri/James ... ontrol.pdf
So the James tone stack actually dates to the 1940s!
Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 05 Jan 2011, 16:08
by ~arph
Ha,
And that document has a correspondence in it that says it was designed by Michael Volkoff in July 1939
So perhaps it should be the Volkoff tonestack then..

Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 05 Jan 2011, 19:46
by soggybag
What should the pot values be for R5,6 and R9,10? Looks like you have two 1M resistors for R5,6 and two 500K resistors for R9,10.
Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 06 Jan 2011, 14:54
by ~arph
Well, it's the james tonestack from the 21st century big muff.
Bass 1M lin, and treble 500k Lin or 1M lin. Both work fine.
It looks a bit funny since the schem is from LTSpice. I was simulating the circuit and decided to throw it out here as I had it drawn up already. That is also why the wool pot is missing. I have it at max gain here.
I was simulating the tone control settings, that is why you see no pots there but two resistors with a parameterized value.
One resistor has value {1meg * param}, the other {1meg - 1meg * param} If we step the param between .1 and .9 then the first resistor will go from 100k up to 900k and the latter from 900k to 100k, hence simulating a rotating pot. The point these two resistors connect is the wiper.
When I built it, it was too noisy with the wool maxed out, so I added the 220pF
Re: Woolly "James" Mammoth
Posted: 11 May 2022, 02:54
by soggybag
I have this in the breadboard right now! I put it together a couple days ago. I hadn’t seen this post until just now!