Megavibe Reverse Engineering (PICS Included)

General documentation, gut shot, schematic links, ongoing circuit tracing, deep thoughts ... all about boutique stompboxes.
User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

Hey guys I am trying to reverse engineer my megavibe.

I have the board layout, all resistors and capacitors used.

What I dont know are some of the transistors because it looks like the builder etched them out so we could not replicate it.

Nor Do I know which LDR is being used. But I have gut shot pictures maybe people can help me out.
Attachments
IMG_0234.JPG
IMG_0233.JPG
IMG_0232.JPG

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

more pics included
Attachments
IMG_0236.JPG
IMG_0235.JPG

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

I measured the resistance of the photocell it ranges from 5.5k when fully exposed and 5.8k when covered with a finger

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

harkkam wrote:I measured the resistance of the photocell it ranges from 5.5k when fully exposed and 5.8k when covered with a finger
I am double checking however as this does not seem right.

User avatar
culturejam
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4062
Joined: 24 Feb 2008, 05:59
Has thanked: 432 times
Been thanked: 562 times
Contact:

Post by culturejam »

harkkam wrote:Nor Do I know which LDR is being used. But I have gut shot pictures maybe people can help me out.
Aren't they all used in a vibe? :scratch:
harkkam wrote:I measured the resistance of the photocell it ranges from 5.5k when fully exposed and 5.8k when covered with a finger
I think you'd need to remove them from the circuit to get an accurate reading.

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

To me it seems it is a CDs and I remeasured the resistance it has 4.8k when fully exposed to light and 65k when totally covered.

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

I used the one closer to the bulb that has leads sticking out of it. SO that made it easier and I didnt have to pull one out

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

After doing some more testing I realized that I was not fully covering the LDR. Now I put some black electrical tape over one of them to get the proper reading.

When fully exposed its 4.5k-5k and when totally covered it is 1.7M to 1.8M

User avatar
Hides-His-Eyes
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 12:34
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Post by Hides-His-Eyes »

How the fuck is he using so much solder to build these?
Testing, testing, won too fwee

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

I covered it some more and now it reads 37M at darkness. What is a good way to measure it?

User avatar
madbean
Information

Post by madbean »

Yeah, his solder budget must be pretty high. A little over the top!

Interesting that there are 5 photocells. More interesting where #5 is located.

I wouldn't worry too much about the actual transistor type used. I would see if you can figure out what pinouts they are, though. That would help narrow it down.

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

I am going to speculate that it is 5k to 2M.

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

Pinouts as in which one IS the base collector emitter?

User avatar
mcaviel
Solder Soldier
Information
Posts: 185
Joined: 18 Nov 2009, 11:41
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Post by mcaviel »

harkkam wrote:Pinouts as in which one IS the base collector emitter?
Yep.
Also every time i see the solder work on this pedal i goes like this :hmmm: :scratch:

User avatar
sinner
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4710
Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 17:16
Location: ...no more
Has thanked: 1031 times
Been thanked: 907 times

Post by sinner »

mcaviel wrote:
harkkam wrote:Pinouts as in which one IS the base collector emitter?
Yep.
Also every time i see the solder work on this pedal i goes like this :hmmm: :scratch:

I do the same when I'm looking into any vintage EHX pedal, but that doesn't change the fact that those are fine sounding units :)

User avatar
culturejam
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4062
Joined: 24 Feb 2008, 05:59
Has thanked: 432 times
Been thanked: 562 times
Contact:

Post by culturejam »

harkkam wrote:Pinouts as in which one IS the base collector emitter?
I would just desolder one of them and measure it. Of course, that would take half an hour on this pedal. :lol:

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

Okay so I figured out that it is a NPN transistor

THat has a pinout reading of E-C-B

the base is not in the middle.

I used this method to test it

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_4/3.html

Very well written.

Would I need the gain reading to be able to find a good substitute?

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

I think this might be the tranny that is being used.


I think it is a BC183L.

http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datashe ... Xuvyzv.pdf

User avatar
solder_blob
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 18 Jan 2011, 00:43

Post by solder_blob »

What are the values on the trimpots?

User avatar
harkkam
Information
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 19:08

Post by harkkam »

its a piher 200 ohm trimpot. Only one of it turned all the way up

Post Reply