Tube Cube Attenuator

Tube or solid-state, this section goes to eleven!
User avatar
mangy
Information
Posts: 7
Joined: 09 May 2011, 17:23
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by mangy »

Hey,

First proper post here..

Borrowed a Tube Cube Attenuator (8 Ohm, 80W) from a mate with the intention of building my own for pottering around with. Expected to pop it open and find an l pad or rheostat and a bunch of resistors etc.. But this is a transformer based design..

I'll add a couple more photos later once I've taken the pcb out...
Attachments
tubecube1.jpg
tubecube2.jpg
tubecube3.jpg
tubecube4.jpg
tubecube5.jpg
tubecube5.jpg (74.92 KiB) Viewed 2541 times

User avatar
Hides-His-Eyes
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 12:34
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Post by Hides-His-Eyes »

Any part numbers going?
Testing, testing, won too fwee

User avatar
bancika
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 279
Joined: 02 Jan 2008, 02:24
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by bancika »

interesting, I wonder what dissipates the heat
The new version of DIY Layout Creator is out, check it out - https://github.com/bancika/diy-layout-creator
Check out my site with DIY gutars, amps and pedals http://diy-fever.com

User avatar
DeanM
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 441
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 20:42
my favorite amplifier: Marshall VM 2466
Location: Ireland
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Post by DeanM »

That looks interesting. how does it sound? I have a hotplate but have been tempted to sell it and make somethin.

Also, whats the markings on the PCB? looks like black marker and looks like something is covered over? Maybe they're using someone elses PCBs?

User avatar
mangy
Information
Posts: 7
Joined: 09 May 2011, 17:23
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by mangy »

No visible part numbers..

Will let you know how it handles the heat and sounds tomorrow when the sprogs are at nursery..

Tried cleaning off the marker pen, but the details have also been scraped... inverted the image to show it better.. any ideas?
Attachments
tubecube7.jpg
tubecube7.jpg (80.77 KiB) Viewed 2511 times
tubecube6.jpg
tubecube8.jpg
tubecube9.jpg

User avatar
Hides-His-Eyes
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 12:34
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Post by Hides-His-Eyes »

Why scrub your own PCBs? Real odd behaviour.
Testing, testing, won too fwee

User avatar
FiveseveN
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 569
Joined: 25 Oct 2009, 21:20
Location: Romania
Has thanked: 196 times
Been thanked: 106 times
Contact:

Post by FiveseveN »

Why scrub your own PCBs?
Unless... it's not.
There's a logo under there. Can anyone make it out? Looks like 4 letters, IMX_G?
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. (Charles Darwin)

User avatar
bajaman
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4513
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 2014 times

Post by bajaman »

be kind to all animals - especially human beings

User avatar
bajaman
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4513
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 2014 times

Post by bajaman »

...........as he is only using one side of this NXG stereo impedance matching volume control, what is the bet that he connects the left output to the right input, and then takes the right output to the output jack socket for "his" 160 watt version :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
bajaman :wink:
be kind to all animals - especially human beings

User avatar
Hides-His-Eyes
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 12:34
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Post by Hides-His-Eyes »

Fair's fair, turning a component into a product, but the attempt to hide it is hilarious
Testing, testing, won too fwee

User avatar
bajaman
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4513
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 2014 times

Post by bajaman »

............................................ on Ebay - https://cgi.ebay.com/NXG-NX-VM80-Volume ... 6030243019

second hand $11.00 :wink:

as the blurb says "these retail for US$33.00 but are hard to find" (I wonder why? :lol: )
bootweeaker of the year award????
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings

User avatar
bajaman
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4513
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 2014 times

Post by bajaman »

oh well - I suppose the box and the fancy knob,(and the audio wanker wiring) must account for the dramatic 1000% markup :wink: :wink:
bajaman
be kind to all animals - especially human beings

User avatar
bajaman
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4513
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 2014 times

Post by bajaman »

oh yeah - and the "mutilation" of the switch must be expensive too!!
be kind to all animals - especially human beings

User avatar
Hides-His-Eyes
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1943
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 12:34
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Post by Hides-His-Eyes »

Fair's fair here, I had no idea such an assembly even existed. You gotta admire his business sense...
Testing, testing, won too fwee

User avatar
mangy
Information
Posts: 7
Joined: 09 May 2011, 17:23
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by mangy »

Well spotted/sourced bajaman..

..I agree fair's fair on the use of an existing component in another product.. I'd heard of the transformer approach to attenuation before but presumed that all of the hi-fi speaker volume controls were l pads of varying quality..

..still.. will fire an amp up tomorrow & see if this thing cooks..

..so, is the autoformer a reactive load on the amp?..

User avatar
Steven_M
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 386
Joined: 06 Jul 2009, 19:50
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Post by Steven_M »

I like this part of his website the best:
Same sound, same parts and specs, however, this one has a new rugged metal enclosure, additionally, comes equipped with a heavy carry handle. Also, for you DIYers out there, this enclosure can be opened up. Thanks for looking!



http://www.thetubecube.com/component/pa ... /Itemid,1/

User avatar
Steven_M
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 386
Joined: 06 Jul 2009, 19:50
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Post by Steven_M »


User avatar
DeanM
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 441
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 20:42
my favorite amplifier: Marshall VM 2466
Location: Ireland
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Post by DeanM »

bajaman wrote:...........as he is only using one side of this NXG stereo impedance matching volume control, what is the bet that he connects the left output to the right input, and then takes the right output to the output jack socket for "his" 160 watt version :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
bajaman :wink:
I saw on another forum after a google search he replied to a customers email and told them that that was how he did it. he said they were in series.

User avatar
mangy
Information
Posts: 7
Joined: 09 May 2011, 17:23
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by mangy »

Following a couple of sound tests.. my opinion is that this attenuator offers very poor quality sound.. perhaps it might be fine for the intended hi-fi use but it certainly doesn't meet the requirements of an instrument amp..

I ran it through a 50w amp.. popped the clean volume up full.. minimum attenuation on the tube cube and the amp had lost all the spank, thump & dynamics... increasing the attenuation only made the sound quality worse... very thin and squished.. quite like a cheap digital multi-effects unit... or an elevator speaker...

Also, even the minimum setting had quite an effect on the amp... it was very quiet indeed... my amp was louder at 3 on the volume without the cube than at full with the cube on minimum...

User avatar
phatt
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1217
Joined: 04 Aug 2010, 05:17
Location: Morayfield SE Qld AU
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 338 times

Post by phatt »

mangy wrote:Following a couple of sound tests.. my opinion is that this attenuator offers very poor quality sound.. perhaps it might be fine for the intended hi-fi use but it certainly doesn't meet the requirements of an instrument amp..

I ran it through a 50w amp.. popped the clean volume up full.. minimum attenuation on the tube cube and the amp had lost all the spank, thump & dynamics... increasing the attenuation only made the sound quality worse... very thin and squished.. quite like a cheap digital multi-effects unit... or an elevator speaker...

Also, even the minimum setting had quite an effect on the amp... it was very quiet indeed... my amp was louder at 3 on the volume without the cube than at full with the cube on minimum...
Hi mangy,,, Google *Reamping* ideas .

Also the load is wrong,,,,, try a 30 Ohm Sand box and tap a line level from that then send your signal to a second amp.
(simple voltage division after the load resistor,, I use a 470 k series R into a 10k pot,, so simple yet so stunning results)

Yoo hoo :horsey: I've never looked back,, ,winky.
Phil.

Post Reply