GodSaveMetal wrote:PLEASE!! Mr DIRK it would be a great idea for posting that adapter for replacing MN3005 with PTs!!!! some pictures or scheme to do that adaptation??? It would be fineDirk_Hendrik wrote:Careful with remarks like this. They're similar to calling every dist with clippers in the feedback loop a TS clone.roseblood11 wrote:a pt-80 clone, I guess.
The setup of compressor, filter, delay line, filter, expander for delay pedals is extremely common. Therefore when the delayline in that setup is replaced from a BBD chip by a PT2399 delay line doesn't automatically make it a PT80 clone.
Upsairs I have a EH DMM with the MN3005's bypassed and replaced by PT's. Does that make it a PT80 clone?![]()
![]()
Eehrm.. "adapter"?? Not really. Adaption? Yes. that's correct.
But (there's always one),
What I did was not make a MN3005 to PT2399 conversion. At the time I wrote the text you quote above I had a DMM on the bench where the MN's were removed and their in and out PCB terminals connected to 2 filterless PT2399 boards. A PT2399 delayline without the filtering. The delay time control was in no way controlled by the DMM's delay and chorus/vib depth control.
To make a full, universal, MN3003 to PT2399 adapter means that one will need a freq to control current converter as well that converts the BBD clock from the original circuit to a control current controlling the PT2399's delay time. Good thing is that one gets rid of the BBD biasing.