Timmy schem for cross reference for anyone else (like me) that would have to look it up to know what the structure looks like.


Manfred wrote: ↑19 Sep 2022, 14:20In fact the same circuit structure, then what's the point of gooping components.Nocentelli wrote: ↑19 Sep 2022, 11:52 So essentially Paul Cochrane's Timmy, minus the bass pot but with half ge diodes?![]()
![]()
The circuit copier fears nothing more than that his circuit is copied.![]()
Yes, but this is because he recycled, with minimal and inconsequential changes, a relatively original design that Paul Cochrane came up with in the early '90s and has been making by hand since then.... Brad couldn't really go wrong. Same as Lovepedal Sean's Amp 11 and Danelectro's Transparent OD, pretty unethicalGratefulEight wrote: ↑19 Sep 2022, 14:54
....whatever amount of copying and component-swap tinkering Brad may have done in getting there, the end product does reliably produce a very nice drive sound.
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
It seems that unethical is a bit relative in the world of analog guitar circuits, considering here we are deconstructing Brad's "work" without knowing beforehand it's a copy to...copy it? Not to turn around and sell Paul's design as our own "Boutique" thing like Brad has done, but it's not like Paul is earning royalties on what we put together either.Nocentelli wrote: ↑19 Sep 2022, 18:46Yes, but this is because he recycled, with minimal and inconsequential changes, a relatively original design that Paul Cochrane came up with in the early '90s and has been making by hand since then.... Brad couldn't really go wrong. Same as Lovepedal Sean's Amp 11 and Danelectro's Transparent OD, pretty unethicalGratefulEight wrote: ↑19 Sep 2022, 14:54
....whatever amount of copying and component-swap tinkering Brad may have done in getting there, the end product does reliably produce a very nice drive sound.
I'd agree it is relative, or more like it is a spectrum:GratefulEight wrote: ↑20 Sep 2022, 15:19 It seems that unethical is a bit relative in the world of analog guitar circuits....
This isn't the point: It's not about Paul's hypothetical "lost sales" from individual diy-ers making their own clone, or even knocking out a copy for a friend for the cost of parts who doesn't want to/can't afford a Timmy, it's about a commercial pedal brand passing off a pedal as their own when it is not really anything other than a tweaked version of a relatively original design made by a sole builder.GratefulEight wrote: ↑20 Sep 2022, 15:19 .....it's not like Paul is earning royalties on what we put together either.
There isn't a "solution" as such, but freestompboxes.org's very existence and mission to trace and document every pedal ever made is part of the ongoing work of exposing these sort of things, informing people about what is inside pedals and occasionally demystifying / countering the hype.GratefulEight wrote: ↑20 Sep 2022, 15:19 What would you say the solution is? I mean, short of convincing every person/company tweaking an existing circuit and passing it off as their own boutique product to knock it off?
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
...the fact that the ICs are sanded and the board gooped and spray painted makes this look very much like an attempt to hide the true origins of the "design" and somehow makes it worse.CheapPedalCollector wrote: ↑23 Sep 2022, 00:19 People do come up with similar designs at the same time or also far apart, without knowledge of the other. Not saying that's the case here....
modman wrote: ↑ Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...
This is true, its suspect for sure. Then again, I don't agree with gooping in general and if I buy a pedal and it's gooped I'll demand a refund and return it because if it breaks I can't fix it, and that's pretty lame.Nocentelli wrote: ↑23 Sep 2022, 05:23 100% agree with all the rest of this post, but ...
...the fact that the ICs are sanded and the board gooped and spray painted makes this look very much like an attempt to hide the true origins of the "design" and somehow makes it worse.CheapPedalCollector wrote: ↑23 Sep 2022, 00:19 People do come up with similar designs at the same time or also far apart, without knowledge of the other. Not saying that's the case here....
Thanks for doing the vero layout! That'll make it easier for some folks to get theirs going for sure.mirosol wrote: ↑09 Dec 2022, 12:51 Yup. Trying to hide that there was an influence from somewhere else is not all that cool. I think there's been a truckload of goop discussion before. There is simply no logical reason to do it. It'll prevent or make legit repairs way harder than they need to be, etc. I've not found any positive points on goop yet. And at some point someone's going to degoop it anyway and usually (like nine point nine times out of ten) it's a circuit that's been done before, with minor tweaks, if even that.
Anyway. Here's a stripboard layout (which is quite easy to repair and mod once you've built one...). Currently unverified, but seems to be ok.
+m