Page 1 of 1

Futerlec Transistors

Posted: 16 May 2012, 16:25
by mojah63
Just a little FYI... I bought 60 transistors with some other stuff I couldn't get from Tayda. All the HFE's were lower than you would expect. I think they must have bought rejects. For me it's ok, I expected most to be low after Chris B posted his findings in another thread but figured some people may find this info useful.

BC109C ON brand Hfe's 77 to 190
BC107's Motorola 75-90 3 unmarked brand 225- 250
BC184 ITT 280-320

Re: Futerlec Transistors

Posted: 16 May 2012, 19:26
by Seiche
mojah63 wrote:Just a little FYI... I bought 60 transistors with some other stuff I couldn't get from Tayda. All the HFE's were lower than you would expect. I think they must have bought rejects. For me it's ok, I expected most to be low after Chris B posted his findings in another thread but figured some people may find this info useful.

BC109C ON brand Hfe's 77 to 190
BC107's Motorola 75-90 3 unmarked brand 225- 250
BC184 ITT 280-320
wow the BC109C are sucky low. would probably make good fuzz transistors though :thumbsup
Are you sure the battery in your DMM isn't drained? Happened to me the other day and it measured a bunch of BC547s as well below 200-300 (about the range of all your transistors combined), when they actually were well over 500-600!

Re: Futerlec Transistors

Posted: 17 May 2012, 00:39
by PokeyPete
mojah63 wrote:Just a little FYI... I bought 60 transistors with some other stuff I couldn't get from Tayda. All the HFE's were lower than you would expect. I think they must have bought rejects. For me it's ok, I expected most to be low after Chris B posted his findings in another thread but figured some people may find this info useful.

BC109C ON brand Hfe's 77 to 190
BC107's Motorola 75-90 3 unmarked brand 225- 250
BC184 ITT 280-320
Only the BC109C seems low to me. The other two are right at mid range, just what you would expect.

Re: Futerlec Transistors

Posted: 17 May 2012, 13:04
by mojah63
I don't use my DMM hfe checker anymore. It always reads 15 to 22% higher (and the error is not linear in respect to hfe ranges) than using RG Keen's circuit. I use a traceable DMM at the lab were I work with a traceable power supply and set the resistors to exactly the values. Plus I can do leakage checks on germs. I expected lower gains from them and got them so I'm ok with it. I need some lower hfe's to build some Fuzz Faces anyway. Just wanted to let some others know in case they expect to get a BC109C at or near spec. I did expect more of the unsorted 107's to be higher, yeah the 184's are good though.