Page 1 of 1
Crews Maniac Sound - DPA-2A Discrete Acoustic Preamp [schematic]
Posted: 13 Feb 2013, 01:14
by smmymms
Hi everyone.
I found such a thing, do I need to have in the SEPP is the first part in this schematic?
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 13 Feb 2013, 01:53
by rcustoms
smmymms wrote:Hi everyone.
I found such a thing, do I need to have in the SEPP is the first part in this schematic?
what do you need exactly?
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 13 Feb 2013, 02:20
by smmymms
2SJ74 is the end of production. I'd like to achieve in the emitter follower of 2SK170.
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 13 Feb 2013, 12:57
by ~arph
A simple google search revealed:
2N5459 for the 2SK170
2N5462 for the 2SJ74
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 14 Feb 2013, 00:08
by smmymms
Thanks arph

But, I think I want to use Japanese FET I live in Japan.
I want to know the meaning of the first stage using the SEPP.
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 14 Feb 2013, 10:26
by ~arph
But can't you just order them from tayda or something? they ship international.
I don't know what you mean with SEPP

Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 14 Feb 2013, 12:58
by resynthesis
^ Single-ended push pull
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 14 Feb 2013, 13:42
by ~arph
Ah, yes.
Well I guess it is to buffer the signal from the 4n7 - 1k and 10k parallel tone shaping right before the op amps. Why the designer chose SEPP stages I don't know.
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 17 Feb 2013, 20:23
by earthtonesaudio
~arph wrote:Why the designer chose SEPP stages I don't know.
Yeah that's just crazy.
It looks like they chose a 5532 for whatever reason, and then ran into the problem of its low input impedance (especially with a piezo). So they tacked on the buffers, choosing a SEPP over a single JFET for reasons best left a mystery.
Could have avoided all those extra parts by using a more conventional high impedance input op-amp in a non-inverting configuration in place of the 5532.
Re: Crews Maniac Sound DPA-2A
Posted: 17 Feb 2013, 23:53
by smmymms
It's as I thought too.
I was glad to clear it

Very thanks!