Dunlop - GCB-950 Cry Baby Octace Wah  [schematic]

All about modern commercial stompbox circuits from Electro Harmonix over MXR, Boss and Ibanez into the nineties.
Post Reply
User avatar
GorillaHuman
Information
Posts: 44
Joined: 10 Nov 2011, 17:57
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by GorillaHuman »

kh602 wrote:Does anyone happen to have pictures of the crybaby octave wah from
The early 90s? Gcb-95O. Would be amazed if anyone has gut shots of this pedal. I have seen
This wah knocking around once in a blue moon. Seems rare to come by.
Recently acquired one of those crybaby octave wahs. Bought it as defective. Well, yeah, its defective alright. But even its shot-out guts are worth taking a picture off, since I cannot find ANY info on these babies on zeh internetz.
The side pots regulating ?? and ?? are broken, the pot for the sweep is broken, there is a red LED missing next to the green one, and the inductor was delivered as shown at the last two pictures. I dont know if it works or is the original one. It has been removed using a cutter instead of desoldering. Bottom plate and the plate at the front are missing.
I don't know what this poor pedal did to the previous owner, but imma try to fix it and check out its sound.
Any suggestions on the inductor? I'll just replace the pots, but how can I salvage the inductor?
IMG_20130822_143901.jpg
IMG_20130822_143910.jpg
IMG_20130822_143920.jpg
IMG_20130822_144526.jpg
IMG_20130822_144536.jpg
IMG_20130822_144543.jpg
IMG_20130822_144617.jpg
IMG_20130822_144633.jpg
Unknown inductor
Unknown inductor

User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4156
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 08:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 857 times
Contact:

Post by Dirk_Hendrik »

I may be mistaken but the middle of those component view photo's show signs of acid like corrosion. Suggets leaking electrolitic caps.
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com

User avatar
Ice-9
Transistor Tuner
Information
Posts: 1086
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:29
my favorite amplifier: Marshall
Completed builds: Far to many to afford the enclosures for them all. :)
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 359 times
Contact:

Post by Ice-9 »

Dirk_Hendrik wrote:I may be mistaken but the middle of those component view photo's show signs of acid like corrosion. Suggets leaking electrolitic caps.

Agreed, picture 7 has two electros pointing in towards each other , one is marked 22uf the other is probs the same , they both look to be the culprits.
It's fairly straight forward, if you want to start it , press start. You can work out the rest of the controls for yourself !

No silicon heaven ? preposterous ! Where would all the calculators go ?

User avatar
GorillaHuman
Information
Posts: 44
Joined: 10 Nov 2011, 17:57
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by GorillaHuman »

Yes, on closer inspection these do look nasty :thumbsup Placed on my to-do list!
Can I fire the wah up without the inductor in place? What will it sound like? Like a fixed-wah or ..?

User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4156
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 08:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 857 times
Contact:

Post by Dirk_Hendrik »

yes you can. There will be no Wah whatsoever,
So, while you've got some work to do getting that board clean again, and you could do that in the time you're waiting on a replacement inductor. By the time the soldering is good again, and possible defective electrolits are replaced without even wondring wether they still might be good (they're too cheap to leave in plave), your freshly ordered inductor will have arrived on your doormat.
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com

User avatar
christoba
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 23:52

Post by christoba »

Hello Folks,

I've got an old pedal that I've been trying to revive. Its a GCB-950 Octave Wah. Both the wah and octave distortion weren't working. I replaced some clearly bad resistors and the pots which ended up getting the distortion going. However, I am having a problem with the wah. If I disassemble the board and parts and then fire the unit back up, the wah will will work perfectly. However, if I turn the distortion on the wah will work with the distortion until I turn off the wah. Then the wah will no longer function with both the distortion on or off. So, engaging the distortion effectively knocks out the wah once the distortion has been turned back off. I was thinking that maybe a cap is going bad but they all look pretty good. Any ideas?

User avatar
modman
a d m i n
Information
Posts: 4817
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 16:57
Has thanked: 4287 times
Been thanked: 2008 times

Post by modman »

christoba wrote:Hello Folks,

I've got an old pedal that I've been trying to revive. Its a GCB-950 Octave Wah. Both the wah and octave distortion weren't working. I replaced some clearly bad resistors and the pots which ended up getting the distortion going. However, I am having a problem with the wah. If I disassemble the board and parts and then fire the unit back up, the wah will will work perfectly. However, if I turn the distortion on the wah will work with the distortion until I turn off the wah. Then the wah will no longer function with both the distortion on or off. So, engaging the distortion effectively knocks out the wah once the distortion has been turned back off. I was thinking that maybe a cap is going bad but they all look pretty good. Any ideas?
I merged your topic with an existing one, because maybe the solution is in this thread.
I don't think we have a schematic - but worth checking for corrosion.
Please, support freestompboxes.org on Patreon for just 1 pcb per year! Or donate directly through PayPal

User avatar
astrobass
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 548
Joined: 02 Mar 2013, 01:30
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Post by astrobass »

Does it use FET switching or mechanical bypass?

User avatar
christoba
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 23:52

Post by christoba »

I'm thinking that the 2 SCL4016BE chips are responsible for the switching. The pictures of the pedal are exactly the same as my pedal. I'm wondering if I should go after the caps as I would guess they are not giving up the juice once I cut the power which would cause my issue. Does that make sense to anyone. Its okay if it doesn't, I'm a mechanical engineering kind of guy; electronics confuse the hell out of me for some reason.

User avatar
digi2t
Degoop Doctor
Information
Posts: 283
Joined: 09 Feb 2011, 15:10
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Post by digi2t »

I traced this pedal a while back, UKToecutter drew up the schematic. It's in a large format, so right click the image, and save it to your computer. Then you'll be able to zoom to your heart's content. Here you go;

Image
No matter how many times I cut it, it`s STILL too short!

https://www.deadendfx.com/

User avatar
christoba
Information
Posts: 3
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 23:52

Post by christoba »

Holy awesome! Thank you for putting in the time on that. BTW, if anyone wants to pull out that fuzz circuit and copy it, its a pretty weird one. Anywho, Does anyone have an idea as to what may be causing my intermittent wah availability?

Thanks,
Chris

User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4156
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 08:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 857 times
Contact:

Post by Dirk_Hendrik »

Holy quack indeed. Thanks for the time invested that provides this starting point. :thumbsup
When going for readability/signal flow a redraw is required. As for a first impression, a 100n (C31) from input to ground?? Hard to believe.
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com

User avatar
digi2t
Degoop Doctor
Information
Posts: 283
Joined: 09 Feb 2011, 15:10
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Post by digi2t »

Dirk_Hendrik wrote:Holy quack indeed. Thanks for the time invested that provides this starting point. :thumbsup
When going for readability/signal flow a redraw is required. As for a first impression, a 100n (C31) from input to ground?? Hard to believe.
Read it and weep. Here are all my tracing pics. PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT THE FUZZ POT IS A B22K, AND NOT A B10K. I'VE UPDATED THE PICTURE, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF IT WILL SHOW. I still have this unit, and when I bought it, some doofus stuck a 10k in it, for I don't know why. Research, and confirmation from a Dunlop tech, has this pot as a B22K. The A470K pot is correct. My unit now sports the correct Omeg pots that it originally came with. As with the schematic, save them to your computer to see them full size.

Wah pot board;
Image

Enhanced trace side;
Image

Components and notes (fuzz pot is B22K, not B10K);
Image

Component side traces (this is a double-sided board);
Image

Redraw? Knock yourself out brother. I've stuck a fork in this sucker.
No matter how many times I cut it, it`s STILL too short!

https://www.deadendfx.com/

User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4156
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 08:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 857 times
Contact:

Post by Dirk_Hendrik »

Read.
When did a 220pF cap (C31) become a 100n? ;-)
220p makes sense as a RF eliminating cap (and the first part to remove, get rid of tonesuck and fck the FCC).

I do not get where C10 (220n to gnd) came from either.
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com

User avatar
digi2t
Degoop Doctor
Information
Posts: 283
Joined: 09 Feb 2011, 15:10
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Post by digi2t »

I'll check it again tonight Dirk. They're small, and the eyesight's not what it used to be. :roll:

As for the intermittent wah, the small board is soldered directly to the pot, and there is no other support for it. I could see the solder cracking here.
No matter how many times I cut it, it`s STILL too short!

https://www.deadendfx.com/

User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4156
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 08:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 857 times
Contact:

Post by Dirk_Hendrik »

Redraw of above schem to get the signal flow (a little more) clear. The 4016 based switching screws a lot. Unverified for component values. Just a work in progress. Questions raised: 1) The power supply transistor suggets being a PNP type and not the MPSA18 in the photo. 2) A connection expected between U1 pin 3 and U1 pin 8. U1 pin 3 was that 4016 gate that was connected to a 2M2 only. The connection in the below schem makes far more sense.
GCB95O.pdf
(27.8 KiB) Downloaded 83 times
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com

User avatar
Dirk_Hendrik
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 4156
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 08:44
Location: Old Amsterdam
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 857 times
Contact:

Post by Dirk_Hendrik »

Correction:
GCB95O.pdf
(27.89 KiB) Downloaded 183 times
Sorry. Plain out of planes.

http://www.dirk-hendrik.com

Post Reply