Help with IC Big Muff with James tonestack

Forum dedicated to helping people debug and troubleshoot non-functional pedals or builds. Please use an clear and informative title, indicating circuit and basic problem. Don't forget to mark the issue as fixed if this is the case.
Post Reply
User avatar
tonymcbony
Breadboard Brother
Information
Posts: 138
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 13:08
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Post by tonymcbony »

Hi folks,

I've been working on this for a bit - an IC Big Muff with a James Tonestack, and an output buffer.
I literally just clapped a generic buffer on the end but I think I arsed it up - nothing comes through.
Can you spot any glaring errors around there?

I feel that R13 is not required and didn't include it in the build.
muffic.png

User avatar
Nocentelli
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 2211
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
Location: Leeds, UK
Has thanked: 1115 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Post by Nocentelli »

Buffer looks suspect: For an inverting buffer, you want a resistor in series with the inverting input, a resistor of equal value in the feedback loop, and the non-inverting input connected directly to VB (or VR).
modman wrote: Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...

User avatar
tonymcbony
Breadboard Brother
Information
Posts: 138
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 13:08
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Post by tonymcbony »

Nocentelli wrote:Buffer looks suspect: For an inverting buffer, you want a resistor in series with the inverting input, a resistor of equal value in the feedback loop, and the non-inverting input connected directly to VB (or VR).
Ah cool.

I was using this:
Image

But I think I should use this (without the 5pf):

Image

(both from http://www.muzique.com/lab/buffers.htm)


That seem the way forward?

Also, if I may pick your brain, in which cases would you prefer an inverting buffer over a non-inverting buffer?

User avatar
tonymcbony
Breadboard Brother
Information
Posts: 138
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 13:08
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Post by tonymcbony »

Right so that was the issue.

However I think I need to get the right input impedence:

With 1M resistors, there is a squeal that's created when the volume control is at zero
With 22k resistors, there's no squeal but the tone controls are ineffective until the volume is turned up a tad. Is there a way to calculate the required impedence setting for the buffer?

User avatar
Nocentelli
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 2211
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 07:06
Location: Leeds, UK
Has thanked: 1115 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Post by Nocentelli »

tonymcbony wrote:
Ah cool.

I was using this:
[ Image ]
Almost, but your schematic has the input connected to the inverting (-ve) input instead of the non-inverting.

I'm not really certain why you would choose one arrangement over the other, but I think it would depend on what input impedance you wanted. Non-inverting can be higher impedance with less noise, so migjt be chosen for a standalone buffer, or as the input stage. Inverting uses fewer parts so might be chosen if the buffer follows another stage and high input impedance is not critical.

As for the squeal: You could try shifting the volume pot to after the buffer stage, so the volume pot setting has no influence over the tonestack. The input impedance of an inverting buffer is set by the series input resistance, so 22k is pretty low, and it is really just an inverting gain stage with the gain set at 1 (gain = loop resistance/input resistance). You could also try switching it to a proper non-inverting buffer to see if that helps.
modman wrote: Let's hope it's not a hit, because soldering up the same pedal everyday, is a sad life. It's that same ole devilish double bind again...

Post Reply