transformer coil inductance [SOLVED]
- poiureza
- Breadboard Brother
I'm trying to simulate a pickup in front of a classic fuzz with a transformer according to the AMZ guide.
I'm a bit perplex about the inductance values :
From the data sheet, coil 1 (primary) has :
- 10K impedance @1kHz
- 480R DC resistance
Thus 10K = 480 + 2.pi.F.L (looking at amplitude values only)
Thus L = ~ 1.6Henry
But my inductance DMM gives me 4.5H across the lugs of the primary coil.
How comes ?
I can imagine some influence of mutual inductance due to the second coil but my estimate of that is about 0.1H.
Still pretty far from explaining the 2.9H difference.
Any idea ?
Primary :
2500 turns (0.06mm diam)
10K impedance @1kHz
480R DC resistance
Secondary :
400 turns (0.08 mm diam)
1K impedance @1kHz
125R DC resistance
I'm a bit perplex about the inductance values :
From the data sheet, coil 1 (primary) has :
- 10K impedance @1kHz
- 480R DC resistance
Thus 10K = 480 + 2.pi.F.L (looking at amplitude values only)
Thus L = ~ 1.6Henry
But my inductance DMM gives me 4.5H across the lugs of the primary coil.
How comes ?
I can imagine some influence of mutual inductance due to the second coil but my estimate of that is about 0.1H.
Still pretty far from explaining the 2.9H difference.
Any idea ?
Primary :
2500 turns (0.06mm diam)
10K impedance @1kHz
480R DC resistance
Secondary :
400 turns (0.08 mm diam)
1K impedance @1kHz
125R DC resistance
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1301 times
The primary 10kOhms impedance means the transformed secondary impedance of 600Ohms by the the transfer ratio 3.771:1,
The read value of 4.5 Henry is the no-load inductance.
In that case the transformer acts as core type inductor.
In the load mode this inductance is in parallel with the load impedance.
The inductive reactance @1kHz has an impedance of about 28kOhms and has no longer an influenz,
because it is many times larger than the load impedance value of 600 Ohms.
Z = sqrt [R^2 + (2*pi*L)^2]
The read value of 4.5 Henry is the no-load inductance.
In that case the transformer acts as core type inductor.
In the load mode this inductance is in parallel with the load impedance.
The inductive reactance @1kHz has an impedance of about 28kOhms and has no longer an influenz,
because it is many times larger than the load impedance value of 600 Ohms.
By the way, the formula of the serial connection form inductor and resistance is a so called vector addition.Thus 10K = 480 + 2.pi.F.L (looking at amplitude values only)
Z = sqrt [R^2 + (2*pi*L)^2]
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1301 times
Sorry, I forgot "f" in the formula,
Z = sqrt [R^2 + (2*pi*f*L)^2]
Z = sqrt [R^2 + (2*pi*f*L)^2]
- poiureza
- Breadboard Brother
Thanks Manfred !
Yes, my formula was wrong
(late at night and not enough coffee).
Btw the secondary has a 1K impedance specified in the data sheet.
It's a 10:1 transformer (not a mouser part)
I still don't see how we go from 28K calculated primary coil impedance to the specified 10K primary coil impedance
(and 2.8K calculated to 1K specified for the secondary) but I don't want to bother you with this
(transfer ratio is 2500/400 = 6.25 btw)
I'm only going to use the primary in coil/core mode (secondary will remain open).
Eventually my real question is probably : what is my circuit going to see ?
4.5H inductance and 28K impedance ?
Yes, my formula was wrong
Btw the secondary has a 1K impedance specified in the data sheet.
It's a 10:1 transformer (not a mouser part)
I still don't see how we go from 28K calculated primary coil impedance to the specified 10K primary coil impedance
(and 2.8K calculated to 1K specified for the secondary) but I don't want to bother you with this
(transfer ratio is 2500/400 = 6.25 btw)
I'm only going to use the primary in coil/core mode (secondary will remain open).
Eventually my real question is probably : what is my circuit going to see ?
4.5H inductance and 28K impedance ?
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1301 times
Sorry, I am busy in the moment, the reply takes a bit time,
the reply would be gave within the following few days.
the reply would be gave within the following few days.
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1301 times
Hi,
or if each impedances of both sides were measured without any load.
The inductance of the secondary side must be Ls = Lp / (transfer ratio)^2 = 0,115mHenrys.
Please check that using your DMM.
You read the value of 4.5H, without any load.
As already mentioned, in that case, the transformer acts as core type inductor
an your circuit see this read inductance.
It is not perfectly clear, if the primary impedance of 10kOhms should be the impedance the transformed secondary impedance of 1 kOhm,Primary :
2500 turns (0.06mm diam)
10K impedance @1kHz
480R DC resistance
Secondary :
400 turns (0.08 mm diam)
1K impedance @1kHz
125R DC resistance
or if each impedances of both sides were measured without any load.
The inductance of the secondary side must be Ls = Lp / (transfer ratio)^2 = 0,115mHenrys.
Please check that using your DMM.
You read the value of 4.5H, without any load.
As already mentioned, in that case, the transformer acts as core type inductor
an your circuit see this read inductance.
- poiureza
- Breadboard Brother
Thank you very much.Manfred wrote: You read the value of 4.5H, without any load.
As already mentioned, in that case, the transformer acts as core type inductor
an your circuit see this read inductance.
My DMM reads ~0.35H for the secondary when primary is left open.
Btw the reading takes a lot of time to stabilize (like 10 seconds), almost as if fluxes needed to stabilize when the DMM injects probe voltages.
This is really strange because, from what I know, an open transformer coil is not supposed to interact with the other (loaded) one.
And my DMM works fine as it gave the correct reading within a split second when I checked a real (single coil) inductor from another project.
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1301 times
Hi,
got your transformer a continuous coil winding or a coil winding with tapping?
got your transformer a continuous coil winding or a coil winding with tapping?
- poiureza
- Breadboard Brother
You mean a central leg for splitting ?
Yes, the secondary has that.
When I measure the inductance of these partial secondary coils I get ~0.15H for each of them (with primary open)
Yes, the secondary has that.
When I measure the inductance of these partial secondary coils I get ~0.15H for each of them (with primary open)
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1301 times
Yes, I meant that.poiureza wrote:You mean a central leg for splitting ?
Yes, the secondary has that.
When I measure the inductance of these partial secondary coils I get ~0.15H for each of them (with primary open)
First of all, it expressed doubts about the transfer ratio, it is okay to me.
- poiureza
- Breadboard Brother
Shooooot you're right !
I checked the transformer specs again and I hadn't seen that 400 turns was for half the secondary.
The complete secondary has 2x400 turns
One last thing : Ls = Lp / (transfer ratio)^2 , is this formula valid when the primary is open (not used) ?
I checked the transformer specs again and I hadn't seen that 400 turns was for half the secondary.
The complete secondary has 2x400 turns
One last thing : Ls = Lp / (transfer ratio)^2 , is this formula valid when the primary is open (not used) ?
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 1301 times
No, it isn't.One last thing : Ls = Lp / (transfer ratio)^2 , is this formula valid when the primary is open (not used) ?