Dunlop - Cry Baby GCB-95: how to improve it for cheap

A forum devoted to mod, tips and suggestions for upgrading and rehousing your VERY CHEAP commercial stompbox to near boutique excellence.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bside2234
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 260
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:35
Location: Kennewick, WA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by Bside2234 »

I will keep you guys updated.

I was going to throw a couple of different caps on my breadboard and run some wires from the 4.7uf to it to see what sounded best.

I also replaced the 510 ohm (It's a Vox) resistor with a 1K trimpot and that does make a nice audible difference. I set the trimpot at 510 ohms, marked it so I knew where 510 ohms was. I found I liked it with just a little bit of a turn up. I haven't measured where it's at yet.
You could make this an external knob if you wanted as it might be fun to play around with. It does crackle when you turn it. You can have your own "crackle ok" knob on your wah :mrgreen:

User avatar
jrose
Information
Posts: 2
Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 15:59

Post by jrose »

Anyone know where i can get a replacement for the 4.7uf capactior? I recently bought a cry-baby for cheap and it had been removed to be used as a volume pedal. Radio-shack possibly?

User avatar
Bside2234
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 260
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:35
Location: Kennewick, WA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by Bside2234 »

The 4.7uf is a very easy part to find. Very common value.
RS has them: http://www.radioshack.com/product/index ... Id=2103622
Expensive but if you only need one it's not worth doing an online order with anyone.

User avatar
jrose
Information
Posts: 2
Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 15:59

Post by jrose »

Thanks for the quick response.
Really wanting to get this thing up and going.

User avatar
Bside2234
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 260
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:35
Location: Kennewick, WA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by Bside2234 »

No problem. Just make sure you put it in the right way. It's polarized so the negative leg goes to the ground (towards the bottom of the board).

User avatar
Bside2234
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 260
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:35
Location: Kennewick, WA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by Bside2234 »

Well as promised. I soldered some wires to the 4.7uf and ran them to my breadboard. I added 1uf - no difference, 2uf - no difference, 4uf - no difference, 6uf - no difference, then I jumped to 10uf - no difference. I heard absolutely no difference in adding any of them. Maybe I don't have a good enough ear. I tried toe up with each capacitor, toe down, and checked to see if the treble to bass sweep moved with each change. Nothing. Raising the value did nothing for mine.

User avatar
analogguru
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 3238
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 13:58
Been thanked: 123 times
Contact:

Post by analogguru »

Bside2234 wrote:Well as promised. I soldered some wires to the 4.7uf and ran them to my breadboard. I added 1uf - no difference, 2uf - no difference, 4uf - no difference, 6uf - no difference, then I jumped to 10uf - no difference. I heard absolutely no difference in adding any of them. Maybe I don't have a good enough ear. I tried toe up with each capacitor, toe down, and checked to see if the treble to bass sweep moved with each change. Nothing. Raising the value did nothing for mine.
No wonder....
changing this cap only results in an illusion for cork sniffers...

analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.

User avatar
Bside2234
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 260
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:35
Location: Kennewick, WA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by Bside2234 »

Well I guess I am glad I didn't hear any difference then :mrgreen:

User avatar
pz
Solder Soldier
Information
Posts: 217
Joined: 17 Aug 2007, 16:55
Location: Germany/Poland
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 48 times

Post by pz »

analogguru wrote: No wonder....
changing this cap only results in an illusion for cork sniffers...

analogguru
I couldn't hear the difference either, so i did some tests.
Typical Crybaby circuit, 1M input Z Fet buffer added.
Testing rig:
Compact4 headphone out -> 1M input Z wah
Wah output -> Compact4 300k input Z
3u3 vs 4u7 at pedal max position:
4u7vs3u3max.gif
3u3 vs 4u7 at pedal min position:
4u7vs3u3min.gif
Ok, the difference between 3u3 and 4u7 isn't that big, so let's try 3u3 vs (3u3+4u7)
3u3vs3u3+4u7max.gif

User avatar
Bside2234
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 260
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:35
Location: Kennewick, WA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by Bside2234 »

Looks like my ears are pretty good then :applause:

User avatar
floris
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 472
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 12:05
Has thanked: 230 times
Been thanked: 72 times

Post by floris »

@pz: What is the software that you used to measure the frequency transfer function?

User avatar
pz
Solder Soldier
Information
Posts: 217
Joined: 17 Aug 2007, 16:55
Location: Germany/Poland
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 48 times

Post by pz »

floris wrote:@pz: What is the software that you used to measure the frequency transfer function?
https://www.freestompboxes.org/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=2845

User avatar
floris
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 472
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 12:05
Has thanked: 230 times
Been thanked: 72 times

Post by floris »

Thanks, it works great.

User avatar
devastator
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 675
Joined: 19 Jul 2008, 16:00
Location: France
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Post by devastator »

Hi guys,

I bump that thread instread of creating a new one.

i've just received that crybaby and I'd like to mod it, improve the sound possibilities. What cool mod do you recommend me ? I think installing trim pot to mid control (1k5 changed for 2K2trim) and 1K instead of 470resistor (maybe with pot after, if the controls have a real impact to the sound).
Something else to do with that circuit ? (I'm not really sure doing the Q control, I saw videos and that don't really change the sound, at least, nothing that justify drilling a hole installing a pot)

a little pic of my pedal , what thinking about those caps ? (It seems look like panasonic, right ? I found the same type in an old Pionner HI-FI)
Attachments
IMG_1228.JPG

User avatar
lolbou
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 2612
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 21:38
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 220 times

Post by lolbou »

Man, your unit is identical (pcb, components, inductor) to my JH-1... I guess that the name Hendirx does sound better somehow... :lol:
- Are you a mod or a rocker?
- Uh, no, I'm a mocker.

User avatar
devastator
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 675
Joined: 19 Jul 2008, 16:00
Location: France
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Post by devastator »

Sure ?

It's written "original crybaby" in the front, Dunlop can't lie about that :mrgreen:

What's different compared to the regular crybaby ? I think there's some aditional cap around the wah pot , and the 0.01cap is 0.022. But in mine the values seem to be like classic crybaby :hmmm: .

I noted That pedal is really noisier than my Dunlop 535Q. transitors are MPSA18.

User avatar
Dr Tony Balls
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 834
Joined: 07 May 2009, 14:29
my favorite amplifier: Sunn Model T
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 170 times

Post by Dr Tony Balls »

wow.....so giving it a once over, the GCB-95 schematic seems to be about the same as the original Vox Clyde, minus some value differences. I just bought a crazy cheap crybaby on ebay this morning, so i'm looking forward to trying to return it to (approximate) vox specs.

crybaby: https://i532.photobucket.com/albums/ee3 ... 1248197982
vox: http://fuzzcentral.ssguitar.com/mccoy/m ... ematic.gif

One question:

Does anyone know what has changed with the gcb-95 over the years? Ive found a number of schematics online and all of them seem about the same. were there ever radical differences from that one schematic?

User avatar
Bside2234
Resistor Ronker
Information
Posts: 260
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:35
Location: Kennewick, WA
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Post by Bside2234 »

Rev. C and earlier did not have an AC adapter jack ('89 and earlier); Rev. D incorporated an AC adapter jack ('89 - '90); Rev. E was the first to have pc-mounted jacks ('90 - '91); Rev. F incorporated buffered circuitry for improved performance ('91 - '92); Rev. G switched to the coaxial (barrel -style) AC adapter jack ('92 - present). You can determine the revision number of your Crybaby pedal by looking at the bottom of the PC-board (you may have to remove it from the housing to look under it) and look at the ECB-25 (letter), this represents the revision number of the pc-board. If there is not an ECB-25#, then you have a Crybaby manufactured earlier than 1990.

User avatar
devastator
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 675
Joined: 19 Jul 2008, 16:00
Location: France
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Post by devastator »

any marks on mine, just REV.C and Dunlop wrote in the top of track side.

User avatar
lolbou
Old Solderhand
Information
Posts: 2612
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 21:38
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 220 times

Post by lolbou »

My pcb is rev c with ac adapter too (around 1990 then)...

I does have the capacitor on the pot and an extra diode added on the inductor corner resistor. An hendrixian mod, really?
- Are you a mod or a rocker?
- Uh, no, I'm a mocker.

Post Reply