Max 1044 Battery consumption
- markm
- Diode Debunker
Question here for the board;
Anyone know whether the MAX 1044 when used as a charge-pump, does it eat 9V batteries quickly or is it similar to "normal" battery consumption in any given circuit?
Anyone know whether the MAX 1044 when used as a charge-pump, does it eat 9V batteries quickly or is it similar to "normal" battery consumption in any given circuit?
Join together with the "Banned"!
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
I've been wondering the same thing. I should be getting a couple here pretty soon to test my bipolar 18v circuit, so I'll get a chance to measure the consumption and see how much it eats batteries.
I wonder how they compare - battery eating-wise - to doing a similar circuit with a 555?
I wonder how they compare - battery eating-wise - to doing a similar circuit with a 555?
Every chip for a chargepump has some loss and you can't get more than 15-20 mA out of a MAX1044 powered by a normal battery.
I always calculate 50% for the CP-loss, that means if a circuit draw 6mA the battery has app. 10mA to deliver (Cp and circuit) and a std. 9V battery will be weak after 6-8 hours.
The better solution is to use 2 battries in series and not to use a charge pump.
JHS
I always calculate 50% for the CP-loss, that means if a circuit draw 6mA the battery has app. 10mA to deliver (Cp and circuit) and a std. 9V battery will be weak after 6-8 hours.
The better solution is to use 2 battries in series and not to use a charge pump.
JHS
- markm
- Diode Debunker
So, the consumption of two will obviously be less than one powering a charge pump.JHS wrote:Every chip for a chargepump has some loss and you can't get more than 15-20 mA out of a MAX1044 powered by a normal battery.
I always calculate 50% for the CP-loss, that means if a circuit draw 6mA the battery has app. 10mA to deliver (Cp and circuit) and a std. 9V battery will be weak after 6-8 hours.
The better solution is to use 2 battries in series and not to use a charge pump.
JHS
Join together with the "Banned"!
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
I like using two batteries for a bipolar supply, but the biggest problem I have is finding space for the two to fit! That's why I'm interested in charge-pump circuits; to save space.
- bajaman
- Old Solderhand
Information
- Posts: 4512
- Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 21:18
- Location: New Brighton, Christchurch, NZ
- Has thanked: 566 times
- Been thanked: 2014 times
Lots of good info here, INCLUDING a high voltage inverter driven circuit for stepping up voltages etc.
bajaman
http://members.aol.com/sbench101/
bajaman
http://members.aol.com/sbench101/
- markm
- Diode Debunker
I hear ya!soulsonic wrote:I like using two batteries for a bipolar supply, but the biggest problem I have is finding space for the two to fit! That's why I'm interested in charge-pump circuits; to save space.
That's my main interest.
I'm really not a Wall-Wart kinda guy but, Maybe it's time to just build a P/S. And bajaman.....Thanks for that there link!
Join together with the "Banned"!
Information
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 13 Jul 2007, 03:24
- Location: Bay Area, California
interesting. stobiepole and i used R.G.'s +/-9V supply circuit with a 1044 for a recent Gristleizer project. it worked well. stobiepole pointed out to me that there is an advantage to using the chip: you don't get any imbalance between +9V and -9V. they stay equal in magnitude. you may not get that with two batteries.
Information
Hi,
The LTC1044 has an own supply current demand of approx. 60 to 300 µ . I used the LTC 1044 by powering the FETboost with 18V with battery.

regards Uwe[/img]
The LTC1044 has an own supply current demand of approx. 60 to 300 µ . I used the LTC 1044 by powering the FETboost with 18V with battery.

regards Uwe[/img]
Information
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 13 Jul 2007, 03:24
- Location: Bay Area, California
thanks, mark!markm wrote:Interesting.
Not to derail this thread but, welcome gm!!
@lmkv15: nice (eagle) layout.
Information
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 13 Jul 2007, 03:24
- Location: Bay Area, California
perhaps someone would be willing to teach me how to read the supply current characteristics of these chips? i looked at both the MAX1044 and the LTC1044 and i do not see any particular limits. some of the graphs seem to show currents on the order of 40mA.
also, the LTC1044 seems to operate its oscillator in the neighborhood of 5kHz. i understand (from R.G. Keen's writing, GEOFEX) that this often causes a whine in effects pedals. but lmkv15, you did not have this problem. did you do anything special to prevent it?
cheers, gm
also, the LTC1044 seems to operate its oscillator in the neighborhood of 5kHz. i understand (from R.G. Keen's writing, GEOFEX) that this often causes a whine in effects pedals. but lmkv15, you did not have this problem. did you do anything special to prevent it?
cheers, gm
Information
Hi Gm,
I put the clock frequency highly. Pin 1 (Boost) wiring to power supply (connect Pin1 to Pin 8 ).
regards Uwe
I put the clock frequency highly. Pin 1 (Boost) wiring to power supply (connect Pin1 to Pin 8 ).
regards Uwe
Last edited by lmkv15 on 15 Aug 2007, 16:39, edited 1 time in total.
Information
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 13 Jul 2007, 03:24
- Location: Bay Area, California
how embarassing.
it's mentioned right at the top of the datasheet.
thanks, gm
thanks, gm