Fairly simple circuit, i've traced a q&d schem from the p2p insides. sound aint half bad either. the transistor is the only thing i can't figure out. it is marked "E230" but i can't find any info or datasheets on it. I was thinking it might be a jfet, but i'm not sure. any thoughts? i drew the schem according to transistor orientation since i don't know the pinout.
The Funny thing is that I have seen innards from 3 different hot-dot boxes, but all used two transistors and trimmer mounted on a pcb. I assume the second transstor is used as an output buffer there. There can also be recognized two Siemens film capacitors, so I doubt that the input cap is only 180p, please verify what is written on this cap.
analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
The Funny thing is that I have seen innards from 3 different hot-dot boxes, but all used two transistors and trimmer mounted on a pcb. I assume the second transstor is used as an output buffer there. There can also be recognized two Siemens film capacitors, so I doubt that the input cap is only 180p, please verify what is written on this cap.
analogguru wrote:With 180p it acts a little bit like a treble booster as you can see in the graph below.
analogguru
so then, for a more flat response, a larger cap like maybe a 4.7uF could be used on the input, right? This seems like a pretty tiny and versatile circuit, i might whip up a layout now that you have kindly enlightened me as to the datasheet...
do you think based on the datasheet that use of a 2n5457 or similar would require a rebias?
well input caps are used to filter out lows and/or dc current. dc current doesnt need to be filtered because it is always first in the chain. bass problably wouldnt normally be cut on a pieze preamp to give the most transparent sound possible.
TragicTravisty wrote:....dc current doesnt need to be filtered because it is always first in the chain.
...and from where do you know that there is no DC ?
Every piezo-crystal delivers DC when stressed and bended. That it becomes AC is because the stress and bending varies with the signal.
Therefore, depending on the pressure of the strings on the piezo there could be a (small) amount of DC which would detoriate the bias of the FET.
I have to say that I never measured the DC of a piezo - maybe somebody likes to do that with a high-impedance meter.
analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
TragicTravisty wrote:....dc current doesnt need to be filtered because it is always first in the chain.
...and from where do you know that there is no DC ?
Every piezo-crystal delivers DC when stressed and bended. That it becomes AC is because the stress and bending varies with the signal.
Therefore, depending on the pressure of the strings on the piezo there could be a (small) amount of DC which would detoriate the bias of the FET.
I have to say that I never measured the DC of a piezo - maybe somebody likes to do that with a high-impedance meter.
analogguru
and, i'm just guessing here, that the small value of the input cap is directly related to the small amount of dc expected? and if this were to be used as an actual booster in a regular pedal chain, then the cap would be needed for dc blocking right?
and if this were to be used as an actual booster in a regular pedal chain, then the cap would be needed for dc blocking right?
You ever know what the customer does with the unit, for this reason for safety it should be placed there - DC can also occur because the output cap of the previous unit is leaky.
analogguru
There´s a sucker born every minute - and too many of them end up in the bootweak pedal biz.
and if this were to be used as an actual booster in a regular pedal chain, then the cap would be needed for dc blocking right?
You ever know what the customer does with the unit, for this reason for safety it should be placed there - DC can also occur because the output cap of the previous unit is leaky.
analogguru
that's what i thought. so does the small value cap also make the unit function as a treble booster? if i were to up the input cap to say, 1 uF or maybe higher, would that broaden the frequency range of the boost?
Since a piezo-pickup is mainly intended to be mounted on an acoustic guitar I think it should nt compensate the pickup itself, more it should compensate the (shifted) frequency response of the guitar.
As you can see it uses a plastic transistor, a metal-can transistor, two Siemens capacitors and a Piher trimmer. Therefore I suspect that it has been built in UK.
The smaller Siemens film-cap is connected to the input with the green wire and is much higher than 47p - I suspect between 10n and 22n.
analogguru wrote:Since a piezo-pickup is mainly intended to be mounted on an acoustic guitar I think it should nt compensate the pickup itself, more it should compensate the (shifted) frequency response of the guitar.
As you can see it uses a plastic transistor, a metal-can transistor, two Siemens capacitors and a Piher trimmer. Therefore I suspect that it has been built in UK.
The smaller Siemens film-cap is connected to the input with the green wire and is much higher than 47p - I suspect between 10n and 22n.
Something to keep in mind. What is the piezos capacitance? This will matter when making a frequency response chart like Analoguru posted. I have not measured a BB pickup so I don't know what the cap value of the pickup is.
AG how did you model the signal to the preamp? AC voltage source and what value piezo capacitance?
You also have the miller cap drain to gate that makes a fet stage like that act like a charge amp.