Parallel Looper Issues

Forum dedicated to helping people debug and troubleshoot non-functional pedals or builds. Please use an clear and informative title, indicating circuit and basic problem. Don't forget to mark the issue as fixed if this is the case.
User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

I've been working on a parallel mixer with optional tails switch. I modified the switch wiring from Induction's tails mod from the All-Star Digital Reverb, and incorporated the circuit grounding of the sends/bypass from Slacker's looper.
This version is currently working, although after plugging in power there is an initial large pop sound when either the On/Off switch or Tails switch is engaged. After waiting about 20 or 30 seconds after clicking either of these switches the first time, the switches no longer pop. I'm wondering if anyone has any ideas for eliminating this popping sound. Would it be worth trying JFET bypasses?
There is also a soft hiss in the background when engaged; what I'd describe as white noise. It's not super loud but it is noticeable at loud volumes. I'd like to reduce it as much as possible.
I'm also wondering if the 330k/47k resistors in the feedback loop of U2 are too large... those could likely be reduced, keeping the 7:1 ratio?
Any other insights and feedback for improvements would be greatly appreciated... thanks!
Attachments
MIXER_SCHEMATIC.jpg
20220502_133227.jpg
Last edited by spacecommandant on 03 May 2022, 23:08, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Manfred
Tube Twister
Information
Posts: 1848
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
Has thanked: 1597 times
Been thanked: 1300 times

Post by Manfred »

This version is currently working, although after plugging in power there is an initial large pop sound when either the On/Off switch or Tails switch is engaged. After waiting about 20 or 30 seconds after clicking either of these switches the first time, the switches no longer pop. I'm wondering if anyone has any ideas for eliminating this popping sound. Would it be worth trying JFET bypasses?
There is also a soft hiss in the background when engaged; what I'd describe as white noise. It's not super loud but it is noticeable at loud volumes. I'd like to reduce it as much as possible.
I guess it's because C4 needs this time after power on to be charged via R5 to Vref.
Try putting the base of R5 on Vref instead of ground.
I don't know how to put it exactly, Is the hiss more of a constant noise or an alternating noise?

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

Thanks so much for that idea.. I'll try it out tomorrow. The noise is a very steady white noise hiss. It's only moderately loud as I explained, but I don't recall hearing that type of background sound on any pedal I've ever built.

User avatar
ppluis0
Diode Debunker
Information
Posts: 885
Joined: 14 Jul 2010, 18:33
Location: Argentina
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Post by ppluis0 »

spacecommandant wrote: 02 May 2022, 23:28 There is also a soft hiss in the background when engaged; what I'd describe as white noise. It's not super loud but it is noticeable at loud volumes. I'd like to reduce it as much as possible.
Hi commandant,

I think that you are experimenting a phenomenom called "Johnson Noise" that is related to circuits using high value resistors.

https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialog ... ue-25.html

Also the kind of resistor material has its own noise properties: the carbon composition are particularly bad, following by carbon film, following by the most silent ones that are made of metal film.

My suggestion is that you can reduce all high value resistors by an order of magnitude (there are several places of 1Meg in your diagram that can be changed to 100K without damage) and apply in that positions resistors made of metal film if those were previously of carbon film.

Cheers,
Jose

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

Also check those 100p at the feedback loops whether they are 100p or 10p. They are low pass filters. Lower the value, higher the cut-off freq. So instead 4.8kHz you end up with 48kHz.

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

ppluis0 wrote: 03 May 2022, 11:29
spacecommandant wrote: 02 May 2022, 23:28 There is also a soft hiss in the background when engaged; what I'd describe as white noise. It's not super loud but it is noticeable at loud volumes. I'd like to reduce it as much as possible.
Hi commandant,

I think that you are experimenting a phenomenom called "Johnson Noise" that is related to circuits using high value resistors.

https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialog ... ue-25.html

Also the kind of resistor material has its own noise properties: the carbon composition are particularly bad, following by carbon film, following by the most silent ones that are made of metal film.

My suggestion is that you can reduce all high value resistors by an order of magnitude (there are several places of 1Meg in your diagram that can be changed to 100K without damage) and apply in that positions resistors made of metal film if those were previously of carbon film.

Cheers,
Jose
I appreciate your response. I suspected that some of the resistors are too large but I didn't realize the 1Megs in their positions could also contribute to the noise... thanks for that tip.
I normally only use metal film resistors but I just remembered that some of the 1Megs are actually carbon film as I ran out of metal films.

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 13:44 Also check those 100p at the feedback loops whether they are 100p or 10p. They are low pass filters. Lower the value, higher the cut-off freq. So instead 4.8kHz you end up with 48kHz.
Thanks for the tip. Yeah, they're 100p.

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

Electrolytic cap at the output can be the reason for popping. You may try to ground the output of the looper when is off. Instead of DPDT for tails use 3PDT for additional switching.

Nope, that wont work, you need that output for the tails when looper is off. It's not simple true bypass.

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

Do you really need that gain on return paths? Don't you have problems with clipping?

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

If you use only one path only one jack is inserted, the other return (input) is generating noise. Use the return connectors as switches to ground them if no jack is inserted to lower the noise if you haven't already done that.

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 19:16 Do you really need that gain on return paths? Don't you have problems with clipping?
I initially had different resistors in there and had clipping, so after fiddling with them I found the 330k/47k to work with no clipping. I still might adjust the ratio a little lower and lower their overall values... maybe something like 100k/18k. I want to have the ability to boost or totally attenuate the return paths.
karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 19:30 If you use only one path only one jack is inserted, the other return (input) is generating noise. Use the return connectors as switches to ground them if no jack is inserted to lower the noise if you haven't already done that.
I'm using switching jacks for the sends and returns so if nothing is plugged in to them they're grounded.

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 19:16 Do you really need that gain on return paths? Don't you have problems with clipping?
I forgot to mention that I'm also currently running it at 18v. There was too much clipping at 9v.

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

spacecommandant wrote: 03 May 2022, 20:05I forgot to mention that I'm also currently running it at 18v. There was too much clipping at 9v.
OK. I saw 9V supply at the schematic and 8x gain - that's calling for trouble.

If this the All-Star Digital Delay that you are referring try he's method - make the switching before the capacitor, you may avoid the popping. Maybe is not best technical solution, but if solves your problem go for it. Or at least try it.
Attachments
2.webp

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

If you want to have ability to boost or attenuate the return paths maybe variable gain stage is better solution than fixed gain and passive attenuation.

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 20:11
spacecommandant wrote: 03 May 2022, 20:05I forgot to mention that I'm also currently running it at 18v. There was too much clipping at 9v.
OK. I saw 9V supply at the schematic and 8x gain - that's calling for trouble.

If this the All-Star Digital Delay that you are referring try he's method - make the switching before the capacitor, you may avoid the popping. Maybe is not best technical solution, but if solves your problem go for it. Or at least try it.
Thanks

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

One more thing. This kind of loopers usually have one of these control sets:
1. blend & master volume
or
2. vol1 & vol2

You have all three. Having two separate vol controls aren't enough? You can avoid that blend/balance pot. There's no need for it. You are summing two signals with previously defined levels. Or use master volume and balance.
karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 20:25 If you want to have ability to boost or attenuate the return paths maybe variable gain stage is better solution than fixed gain and passive attenuation.
Noise levels should be lower and there is no need for blend/balance pot. You can use less gain, you are loosing some dbs with that blend pot.

User avatar
karul
Cap Cooler
Information
Posts: 460
Joined: 02 Jan 2011, 20:28
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Post by karul »

Take a look at Chapter 6 and 9. Highly recommended book. viewtopic.php?p=287940&hilit=Small+Sign ... gn#p287940

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 22:42 Take a look at Chapter 6 and 9. Highly recommended book. viewtopic.php?p=287940&hilit=Small+Sign ... gn#p287940
That looks like a great book... thanks again.

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

karul wrote: 03 May 2022, 20:11
If this the All-Star Digital Delay that you are referring try he's method - make the switching before the capacitor, you may avoid the popping. Maybe is not best technical solution, but if solves your problem go for it. Or at least try it.
[/quote]

I tried moving the wire from between R16 & R17 to before C4 and the pop wouldn't go away, not even after over a minute, so I moved it back. I'm not quite sure how to best move the wire from between R7 & R8 other than leaving it where it is and adding a 10u capacitor on either side of it, before R7 & R8.
I'll post a schematic of Slacker's looper that he designed to show you the bypass that I've tried to incorporate.

User avatar
spacecommandant
Information
Posts: 29
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 01:36
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by spacecommandant »

Here is a schematic of the Tails / Bypass designed by Slacker that I attempted to incorporate. I changed R5 from 1k to 47k since in an earlier version of my circuit, it wouldn't work properly with 1k.
Attachments
Slacker's Tails Bypass.JPG
Last edited by spacecommandant on 05 May 2022, 15:04, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply