T-Rex - Mudhoney [traced]
Information
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
- Completed builds: Highly modded Boss, CE-2
Shoot the Moon Tremolo
Lovetone, Big Cheese
Dinosaural, Tube Bender
Beetronics, Fat Bee
EQD, Acapulco Gold w. mods
Modified Benson Preamp
ROG, Tri-Vibe
A self-composed Tilt EQ
....etc.... - Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Hi all
Almost a year ago I built myself a Mudhoney clone following the stripboard layout from TagboardEffects, which follows the two schematics to be found online. But as it turned out to work quite a bit different than the original I have tried to modify my build in numerous different ways to make it work as intented. But still, it didn't sound as would like it to. But now I have bought myself an old used unit and have tried to trace it!
This is my first trace and I have yet to try building it, but I thought there might be other people interested in this pedal. To me it is a really great sounding pedal that deserves to be traced.
If anything looks odd or wrong please let me know, I am eager to learn
Here are some photos of the circuit: https://ibb.co/album/yWRyfB
Happy new year
/Kasper
Almost a year ago I built myself a Mudhoney clone following the stripboard layout from TagboardEffects, which follows the two schematics to be found online. But as it turned out to work quite a bit different than the original I have tried to modify my build in numerous different ways to make it work as intented. But still, it didn't sound as would like it to. But now I have bought myself an old used unit and have tried to trace it!
This is my first trace and I have yet to try building it, but I thought there might be other people interested in this pedal. To me it is a really great sounding pedal that deserves to be traced.
If anything looks odd or wrong please let me know, I am eager to learn
Here are some photos of the circuit: https://ibb.co/album/yWRyfB
Happy new year
/Kasper
- mirosol
- Resistor Ronker
Nice work on the schem!
However. Are you sure about the way the boost switch is wired? In that position, when activated it takes the 2k2 in parallel with gain pot + the 150R. And that would mean the ohm value on feedback loop would be set at something like 2K1 even with 47K pot maxed.
Otherwise this looks good. Well drawn, easy to read etc.
+m
However. Are you sure about the way the boost switch is wired? In that position, when activated it takes the 2k2 in parallel with gain pot + the 150R. And that would mean the ohm value on feedback loop would be set at something like 2K1 even with 47K pot maxed.
Otherwise this looks good. Well drawn, easy to read etc.
+m
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
Information
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
- Completed builds: Highly modded Boss, CE-2
Shoot the Moon Tremolo
Lovetone, Big Cheese
Dinosaural, Tube Bender
Beetronics, Fat Bee
EQD, Acapulco Gold w. mods
Modified Benson Preamp
ROG, Tri-Vibe
A self-composed Tilt EQ
....etc.... - Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Ah I see! I was unsure about what the correct way of writing the switch. It is the opposite that was my intention! When the switch is off the 2k2 is in parallel - when activated it is floating. Just so I understand you; Pin 1 and Pin 3 should just switch around?
Thank you man!
Thank you man!
- CheapPedalCollector
- Resistor Ronker
Nice
Are you sure C10 and C11 are both 4.7uf ?
Are you sure C10 and C11 are both 4.7uf ?
- Manfred
- Tube Twister
Information
- Posts: 1937
- Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 23:42
- Has thanked: 1671 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
The feedback circuit looks like the RAT mod circuit, C10 should then have a value of 2.2 uF, but perhaps a different frequency response was desired by the developer.
- Cub
- Cap Cooler
Kasper, thank you for taking the time to do this ! I've seen the two earlier traces as well and always wondered about the differences.
C10 has been 4.7µF in the other two Mudhoney schematics on the net as well, so I assume it's correct. It lowers the corner frequency of that RC filter from the 1539 Hz of a stock Rat to a very Tube Screamer ish 720 Hz.
So the boost switch changes the range of the gain pot and R11 from between 150r and 48.5k to 140r and 2.1k. Very clever, as it keeps the frequencies of the RC networks intact, unlike the usual Ruetz switch.
In one of the other traces, there is a third parallel RC network that's always in the circuit. It consists of a 2.2k resistor and 0.1µF cap for, again, a very TS-ish 723 Hz. The switch takes out the 47r + 4.7µF and 560r + 4.7µF networks.
Which version of the boost switch is the older / newer / current version ?
C10 has been 4.7µF in the other two Mudhoney schematics on the net as well, so I assume it's correct. It lowers the corner frequency of that RC filter from the 1539 Hz of a stock Rat to a very Tube Screamer ish 720 Hz.
So the boost switch changes the range of the gain pot and R11 from between 150r and 48.5k to 140r and 2.1k. Very clever, as it keeps the frequencies of the RC networks intact, unlike the usual Ruetz switch.
In one of the other traces, there is a third parallel RC network that's always in the circuit. It consists of a 2.2k resistor and 0.1µF cap for, again, a very TS-ish 723 Hz. The switch takes out the 47r + 4.7µF and 560r + 4.7µF networks.
Which version of the boost switch is the older / newer / current version ?
Last edited by Cub on 04 Jan 2023, 08:59, edited 2 times in total.
I wish I were a chestnut tree, nourished by the sun.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
- mirosol
- Resistor Ronker
Pin numbering doesn't matter. I just wasn't sure which way the boost was on. :) The 140R+1.5K just seemed to me like a way too little resistance in the feedback.Kasperrosenlund wrote: ↑02 Jan 2023, 19:36Just so I understand you; Pin 1 and Pin 3 should just switch around?
If i recall correctly, the clones made with those earlier schems didn't sound quite right. Could it be that those both were just wrong?
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
- mictester
- Old Solderhand
Information
It really is just a tweaked Rat!
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
- mirosol
- Resistor Ronker
I don't think anyone disputed that... :)
But i think it's cool to get the mods correct after years of erroneous clone builds that didn't sound right.
So.. Will someone try this out? Unverified atm. // aaand this is verified on the blog (4.1.2023)
+m
Last edited by mirosol on 04 Jan 2023, 16:37, edited 1 time in total.
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
- Cub
- Cap Cooler
I heard of people replacing the stock 100k gain pot in their Rat for 50k or even 25k because they don't like their Rat to be fuzzy (boo!) but 2.1k is extremely low.mirosol wrote: ↑03 Jan 2023, 12:10Pin numbering doesn't matter. I just wasn't sure which way the boost was on. The 140R+1.5K just seemed to me like a way too little resistance in the feedback.Kasperrosenlund wrote: ↑02 Jan 2023, 19:36Just so I understand you; Pin 1 and Pin 3 should just switch around?
It might make a fun gain range switch with a 100k pot for the stock sound and parallel resistors to taste - 100k for a combined max of 50k, 33k for 25 and the Mud's 2.2k for 2.1k
Good point, that could very well be the case.
I wish I were a chestnut tree, nourished by the sun.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
Information
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
- Completed builds: Highly modded Boss, CE-2
Shoot the Moon Tremolo
Lovetone, Big Cheese
Dinosaural, Tube Bender
Beetronics, Fat Bee
EQD, Acapulco Gold w. mods
Modified Benson Preamp
ROG, Tri-Vibe
A self-composed Tilt EQ
....etc.... - Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Yea, I'm positive
Got you!
I'm sure this is in fact the case. The old schematics did'nt work at all like the original. I don't know if there are many different versions of this pedal (mine is a v.1.1 according to the pcb), but none I've played has functioned like the old schematics. So to me the trace I've made reflect how the boost in fact is - not a new/old/current version, if you get me
Wow, nice work! As I am occupied with other projects atm, I can't for now build it myself and compare it to my original, but I am thrilled to see that someone already did verify your layout on Tagboard
- Cub
- Cap Cooler
Crystal clear ! It seems such an unlikely mistake, though.Kasperrosenlund wrote: ↑04 Jan 2023, 15:18I'm sure this is in fact the case. The old schematics did'nt work at all like the original. I don't know if there are many different versions of this pedal (mine is a v.1.1 according to the pcb), but none I've played has functioned like the old schematics. So to me the trace I've made reflect how the boost in fact is - not a new/old/current version, if you get me
To see an added resistor on a switch in the feedback loop and then write it down as a third parallel RC network with a switch that takes out the other two.
I wish I were a chestnut tree, nourished by the sun.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
- mirosol
- Resistor Ronker
Now this is rather intersting.. Doing an image search for T Rex Mudhoney schematic on duckduckgo, we get result like below. That points to False electronics blog, that links to a russian site: http://valentinych.ru/wp-content/upload ... /Pic_8.gif - which isn't loading right now (could be gone for good). Blog post is from 2017 and the url on the actual schematic image says it's uploaded in july 2013. And if we look at the schem, the boost switch is wired the same as in Kasper's trace. And that is not the same as the two other schematics that can now deemed as wrong.
So i guess there was also a correct drawing floating around since 2013. None of us spotted it though. Well. Better late than never.
+m
So i guess there was also a correct drawing floating around since 2013. None of us spotted it though. Well. Better late than never.
+m
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
Information
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
- Completed builds: Highly modded Boss, CE-2
Shoot the Moon Tremolo
Lovetone, Big Cheese
Dinosaural, Tube Bender
Beetronics, Fat Bee
EQD, Acapulco Gold w. mods
Modified Benson Preamp
ROG, Tri-Vibe
A self-composed Tilt EQ
....etc.... - Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Yea, it is a bit strange..
Interesting! Here it is loadingmirosol wrote: ↑05 Jan 2023, 12:48 Now this is rather intersting.. Doing an image search for T Rex Mudhoney schematic on duckduckgo, we get result like below. That points to False electronics blog, that links to a russian site: http://valentinych.ru/wp-content/upload ... /Pic_8.gif - which isn't loading right now (could be gone for good). Blog post is from 2017 and the url on the actual schematic image says it's uploaded in july 2013. And if we look at the schem, the boost switch is wired the same as in Kasper's trace. And that is not the same as the two other schematics that can now deemed as wrong.
So i guess there was also a correct drawing floating around since 2013. None of us spotted it though. Well. Better late than never.
+m
...I could've saved myself some time doing a search on DuckDuck Go
- mirosol
- Resistor Ronker
Needless to say, but i think Kasper's work finalized the issue of correct Mudhoney (rat mod) topology. So, Kudos!
Now. Anyone have a schem for Alberta?
+m
Now. Anyone have a schem for Alberta?
+m
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/
"No such thing as innocence" -Iron Chic
- Cub
- Cap Cooler
Found the "Valentinych" site: http://valentinych.ru/o-zvuke/gitarnye- ... rmy-t-rex/
I noticed a few differences between Kasper's and Val's schematics,
but I can't see a version number on the boards on Val's site.
I noticed a few differences between Kasper's and Val's schematics,
but I can't see a version number on the boards on Val's site.
Code: Select all
Kasper │ Val
──────────┼──────────
R1 470r │ Rb1 100r
R2 10k │ Rb2 6.8k
R3 10k │ Rb3 6.8k
R10 100k │ missing
R11 150r │ Ra9 15k
R20 510k │ Ra17 100k
R22 100r │ Ra19 1.5k
missing │ Ra20 10k
C16 100nF │ Ca14 10nF
D5 1N4007 │ missing
I wish I were a chestnut tree, nourished by the sun.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
- Axldeziak
- Breadboard Brother
- Cub
- Cap Cooler
Doh, I completely missed the link to Kasper's shots !
I flattened both Kasper's and Val's pics of the boards so it would be easier to compare them, but I don't think there are any differences in the components of which the values are visible ?
Though I have to admit, I'm starting to reach that age where it's getting harder to tell colours apart. Therefore, I attached them so younger eyes can have a look as well.
I wish I were a chestnut tree, nourished by the sun.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
With twigs and leaves and branches and conkers by the ton.
Information
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
- Completed builds: Highly modded Boss, CE-2
Shoot the Moon Tremolo
Lovetone, Big Cheese
Dinosaural, Tube Bender
Beetronics, Fat Bee
EQD, Acapulco Gold w. mods
Modified Benson Preamp
ROG, Tri-Vibe
A self-composed Tilt EQ
....etc.... - Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Thanks!Cub wrote: ↑05 Jan 2023, 20:06 Found the "Valentinych" site: http://valentinych.ru/o-zvuke/gitarnye- ... rmy-t-rex/
I noticed a few differences between Kasper's and Val's schematics,
but I can't see a version number on the boards on Val's site.
Code: Select all
Kasper │ Val ──────────┼────────── R1 470r │ Rb1 100r R2 10k │ Rb2 6.8k R3 10k │ Rb3 6.8k R10 100k │ missing R11 150r │ Ra9 15k R20 510k │ Ra17 100k R22 100r │ Ra19 1.5k missing │ Ra20 10k C16 100nF │ Ca14 10nF D5 1N4007 │ missing
I will recheck mine and see if I missed something.
One thing I now know that is missing in my trace is the 10k at the output - that is in mine as well, apparently just forgot it in the schematic.
I will look into it one of the next couple of days.
- nooneknows
- Resistor Ronker
so, we can make a rat sound like a mudhoney with just two mods, 4.7uF in place of the2.2uF cap on the feedback loop and a 1uF cap in place of the 22nF on the input, interesting