Rediculously modded PT2399 Delay
- oldgravity
- Solder Soldier
Information
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 25 Mar 2009, 06:37
- Location: New Orleans, LA
Nope, I'm guessing NOC3 is busy with his business:
http://noc3effects.com/
However, we have an even more ridiculously modded PT2399 delay brewing up over at the other place:
https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/ ... ic=81668.0
http://noc3effects.com/
However, we have an even more ridiculously modded PT2399 delay brewing up over at the other place:
https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/ ... ic=81668.0
- ~arph
- Cap Cooler
And an even more ridiculous one on my desk here.. (that i is why this thread didn't come up when I searched on ridiculous
)
Four PT2399 in series.. all separate playback and feedback. I'm trying to get the sound of the binson echorec. (Which I got btw)
But I still feel like a bit of an amateur so I do as much reading on PT2399 related threads as possible.

Sorry about the quality. Missing in that picture is a SSM2166 and a MAX395 which now occupy the top left side of the breadboard.
more pics here: http://twitpic.com/photos/arrfx
Four PT2399 in series.. all separate playback and feedback. I'm trying to get the sound of the binson echorec. (Which I got btw)
But I still feel like a bit of an amateur so I do as much reading on PT2399 related threads as possible.
Sorry about the quality. Missing in that picture is a SSM2166 and a MAX395 which now occupy the top left side of the breadboard.
more pics here: http://twitpic.com/photos/arrfx
In the quiet words of the virgin Mary: "Come again?"
- oldgravity
- Solder Soldier
Information
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 25 Mar 2009, 06:37
- Location: New Orleans, LA
Pretty cool. Will be interested to see that shape up.
Let me ask you this:have you considered doing this digitally? Since the PT2399 is already digital delay, it's not like you'd lose any analog mojo. This kind of thing is a prime candidate IMO to use the Spin FV-1 chip. It would be much easier than doing all the mixing, etc. in analog (I've done some of my own experiments with 6 PT2399s in one box in a mixing matrix).
Let me ask you this:have you considered doing this digitally? Since the PT2399 is already digital delay, it's not like you'd lose any analog mojo. This kind of thing is a prime candidate IMO to use the Spin FV-1 chip. It would be much easier than doing all the mixing, etc. in analog (I've done some of my own experiments with 6 PT2399s in one box in a mixing matrix).
- ~arph
- Cap Cooler
Yes I did, but if I undersood correctly the FV-1 does not have enough i/o connections wiith the outside. Like only three pot connections. I need at least five for the delays (4x time and one regen.) seven if I include modulation. Even more if I want to do some tone shaping. Unless the FV-1 has a digital interface (where additional hardware is needed for) I don't see a way to do it with all parameters i need.
Regards,
Arnoud
Regards,
Arnoud
In the quiet words of the virgin Mary: "Come again?"
- oldgravity
- Solder Soldier
Information
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 25 Mar 2009, 06:37
- Location: New Orleans, LA
It's possible to do some clever stuff to get more pots, but once you need 7 pots, you're right that it does become a little less appealing (still possible, though).
- ~arph
- Cap Cooler
Yeah can imagine some clever tricks. Just as with the current button interface I have. I can sense eight different buttons throug a single wire. (just a bunch of voltage dividers).
Also I like to see this project as a good way to practice my skills. I've learned a lot of new stuff already.
Also I like to see this project as a good way to practice my skills. I've learned a lot of new stuff already.
In the quiet words of the virgin Mary: "Come again?"
- gilmour_pugliese
- Resistor Ronker
any news? 
- rasta_maleek
- Resistor Ronker
waitting for advances 