Fairfield Circuitry - Randy's Revenge
- WhiteKeyHole
- Cap Cooler
Yeah, been hoping for some guts for a while.
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
Wow, funny that this came up... I just got done visiting that page and listening to it myself!
Whatever is inside it, I can assure that it woudn't be difficult to build a DIY ring mod that can do similar things.
I recommend the checking out the Frequency Analyzer. It uses an AD633 analog multiplier chip for the ring mod effect... and it can get some very similar sounds to that!

Whatever is inside it, I can assure that it woudn't be difficult to build a DIY ring mod that can do similar things.
I recommend the checking out the Frequency Analyzer. It uses an AD633 analog multiplier chip for the ring mod effect... and it can get some very similar sounds to that!
"Analog electronics in music is dead. Analog effects pedal design is a dead art." - Fran
- DWBH
- Cap Cooler
The EHX one (at least from the demos I've heard) sounds more metallic and less musical. But of course, it all depends on what you're playing.
I've done some searching and the maker himself gave a little info about what's inside.
Quoted from harmony central forum:
EDIT: Oh, and found this in experimentalistsanonymous' archive area

I've done some searching and the maker himself gave a little info about what's inside.
Quoted from harmony central forum:
Yes, I'm using the ICL7660 to get +-9V. I wasn't getting good results (if none at all) operating the modulation IC on a single supply.
Initially the plan was to use a split supply derived from a 15VAC adapter. I was a little skeptic about using a charge pump, what with the high frequency switching and all. Ends up it sounded just as good and much more convenient.
I experimented quite a bit with transformer-diode modulation. Some very nice sounds, but the frequency range and carrier suppression of the IC are what sold me.
I'm using the AD633, a little pricey but it does what it's supposed to do very well. I started with what was in the datasheets and worked from there. No real secret here. You should be able to get some good results, do you remember what the problems were?
I also tried the Gilbert Cell mixer. Worked but the transistor matching was too critical.
EDIT: Oh, and found this in experimentalistsanonymous' archive area

- soggybag
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 279
- Joined: 07 Aug 2007, 23:29
- Completed builds: Fuzz Face, Tone Bender, Big Muff, ICBM, Ugly Face, Green Ringer, Super Fuzz, Multiplex Echo, Multiplex Jr, Rebote, Echo Base, SHO, Fuzz Factory, Titan Boost/Octave, Easy Face, Tone Bender MkII, Trem Shifter, Zero Point Mini...
- Location: San Francisco
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
- Contact:
I suspect the key to getting a smooth ring mod sound is the sine wave carrier. A carrier that has a hard edge such as a square ans a triangle wave add extra harmonics to the mix.
From recent experiments with the Stompboxology Ring Modu matic, I noticed the low pass on the carrier frequency really smoothed out the ring mod sound. You could easily this to any ring mod to increase the range of sounds.
From recent experiments with the Stompboxology Ring Modu matic, I noticed the low pass on the carrier frequency really smoothed out the ring mod sound. You could easily this to any ring mod to increase the range of sounds.
Blog: http://super-freq.com
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
Ha! I knew I heard the signature tone of the 633!
I was playing with a Frequency Analyzer clone on breadboard, and I was able to get clear bell-like tones very easily. It sounded very much like the bell tone you hear at the beginning of the Randy's Revenge clip. The only thing the Frequency Analyzer doesn't do is the tremolo thing, but with a different oscillator, that wouldn't be hard to take care of. That function generator chip the Frequency Analyzer uses is too damn expensive anyway...
I was playing with a Frequency Analyzer clone on breadboard, and I was able to get clear bell-like tones very easily. It sounded very much like the bell tone you hear at the beginning of the Randy's Revenge clip. The only thing the Frequency Analyzer doesn't do is the tremolo thing, but with a different oscillator, that wouldn't be hard to take care of. That function generator chip the Frequency Analyzer uses is too damn expensive anyway...
"Analog electronics in music is dead. Analog effects pedal design is a dead art." - Fran
- Whoismarykelly
- Resistor Ronker
The FA uses a sine wave AFAIK but the LFO doesn't go below the audio range. Im sure if you tweaked the LFO caps and put them on a switch you could get it to do tremolo.
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
Frequency Analyzer doesn't use a standard LFO oscillator setup, it uses an ICL8038 function generator. Looking at the datasheet, yes, it can do very low frequencies, but for any DIY thing, I would recommend something else for the carrier signal oscillator because the 8038 is obsolete and expensive/hard-to-find.
The schematic from Experimentalists Anonymous is probably a great starting point, but that kind of oscillator doesn't do sine wave... though, I found that there isn't a dramatic difference in sound between sine and triangle; slightly more harmonics, but very subtle.
The schematic from Experimentalists Anonymous is probably a great starting point, but that kind of oscillator doesn't do sine wave... though, I found that there isn't a dramatic difference in sound between sine and triangle; slightly more harmonics, but very subtle.
"Analog electronics in music is dead. Analog effects pedal design is a dead art." - Fran
- soulsonic
- Old Solderhand
Information
The sine wave oscillator from Moosapotamus' site would probably be something worth trying.
"Analog electronics in music is dead. Analog effects pedal design is a dead art." - Fran
- earthtonesaudio
- Transistor Tuner
I want somebody to try this:
http://www.audioscientific.com/28_Simpl ... lters_.jpg
http://www.audioscientific.com/28_Simpl ... lters_.jpg
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
- soggybag
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 279
- Joined: 07 Aug 2007, 23:29
- Completed builds: Fuzz Face, Tone Bender, Big Muff, ICBM, Ugly Face, Green Ringer, Super Fuzz, Multiplex Echo, Multiplex Jr, Rebote, Echo Base, SHO, Fuzz Factory, Titan Boost/Octave, Easy Face, Tone Bender MkII, Trem Shifter, Zero Point Mini...
- Location: San Francisco
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
- Contact:
The AD633 needs +-15V to operate well. The Randy's Revenge description claims it runs on 9V. It could have a voltage doubler. Then again maybe it uses something different.
Blog: http://super-freq.com
- earthtonesaudio
- Transistor Tuner
Hm... you could use one of the charge pump ICs, add another oscillator close to it in frequency, and make a wide-range beat frequency oscillator out of it. That would be fun!
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
- Whoismarykelly
- Resistor Ronker
The RR does have a charge pump. I believe it says so on the web site.
- soggybag
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 279
- Joined: 07 Aug 2007, 23:29
- Completed builds: Fuzz Face, Tone Bender, Big Muff, ICBM, Ugly Face, Green Ringer, Super Fuzz, Multiplex Echo, Multiplex Jr, Rebote, Echo Base, SHO, Fuzz Factory, Titan Boost/Octave, Easy Face, Tone Bender MkII, Trem Shifter, Zero Point Mini...
- Location: San Francisco
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
- Contact:
I think the Fairfield site says only that the Randy's Revenge is "Powered by +9V power supply".
Blog: http://super-freq.com
- Whoismarykelly
- Resistor Ronker
Youre right I must be thinking of a post from a forum somewhere. Either way its got headroom and thats not happening at 9v.soggybag wrote:I think the Fairfield site says only that the Randy's Revenge is "Powered by +9V power supply".
- salocin
- Resistor Ronker
Found at HC- posted by the man himself:
I'm using the ICL7660 to get +-9V. I wasn't getting good results (if none at all) operating the modulation IC on a single supply.
Initially the plan was to use a split supply derived from a 15VAC adapter. I was a little skeptic about using a charge pump, what with the high frequency switching and all. Ends up it sounded just as good and much more convenient.
I experimented quite a bit with transformer-diode modulation. Some very nice sounds, but the frequency range and carrier suppression of the IC are what sold me.
I'm using the AD633, a little pricey but it does what it's supposed to do very well. I started with what was in the datasheets and worked from there. No real secret here. You should be able to get some good results, do you remember what the problems were?
I also tried the Gilbert Cell mixer. Worked but the transistor matching was too critical.
It runs off typical 9V adapters. No room for a battery in this one. Current draw is around 125mA
- soggybag
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 279
- Joined: 07 Aug 2007, 23:29
- Completed builds: Fuzz Face, Tone Bender, Big Muff, ICBM, Ugly Face, Green Ringer, Super Fuzz, Multiplex Echo, Multiplex Jr, Rebote, Echo Base, SHO, Fuzz Factory, Titan Boost/Octave, Easy Face, Tone Bender MkII, Trem Shifter, Zero Point Mini...
- Location: San Francisco
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
- Contact:
- salocin
- Resistor Ronker
About to order some ICL7660. At a brief glance looks like a good substitute to MAX1044. Quite keen on a ring mod at the moment, but need +/- power supply for the AD633 (which I have a few of) and the ICL7660 now looks like a better (cheaper) option than the 1044.
- soggybag
- Resistor Ronker
Information
- Posts: 279
- Joined: 07 Aug 2007, 23:29
- Completed builds: Fuzz Face, Tone Bender, Big Muff, ICBM, Ugly Face, Green Ringer, Super Fuzz, Multiplex Echo, Multiplex Jr, Rebote, Echo Base, SHO, Fuzz Factory, Titan Boost/Octave, Easy Face, Tone Bender MkII, Trem Shifter, Zero Point Mini...
- Location: San Francisco
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
- Contact:
From what I understand the 7660 is pin for pin replacement for the 1044, with lower quality specs. I think the 1044 clock at a higher frequency.
Blog: http://super-freq.com