Simple Transistor Compressor
- mictester
- Old Solderhand
Information
No unusual ICs required! Uses just four cheap transistors! Most of you will have all of the parts in your junk boxes!
The transistors used are not critical - any PNP and NPN medium gain silicon types will work well. The coupling capacitors can be bigger or smaller by a factor of two, without affecting its operation. Many of the component values were "chosen" just because they were lying around on the bench! Feel free to experiment with the values - you may find some magic values that really suit your guitar and your playing style!
In the next few weeks, I expect to see this in a hand-painted diecast box, full of "mojo" resistors and capacitors, with the faces of the ordinary, cheap silicon transistors sanded, lots of potting compound spilled inside and for sale on Ebay for $400!!!
The input impedance was originally designed to be about 10k as it was going to be used after another effect pedal. If you want to connect it first in line, before all your other toys, you'll need a higher input impedance: increase the two input bias resistors to 330k or 470k and reduce the input capacitor to 100n or even as low as 47n. Because the circuit uses a crude transistor shunt for level reduction, you'll find that there's a quite tiny amount of second harmonic distortion added, but it's not objectionable.The transistors used are not critical - any PNP and NPN medium gain silicon types will work well. The coupling capacitors can be bigger or smaller by a factor of two, without affecting its operation. Many of the component values were "chosen" just because they were lying around on the bench! Feel free to experiment with the values - you may find some magic values that really suit your guitar and your playing style!
In the next few weeks, I expect to see this in a hand-painted diecast box, full of "mojo" resistors and capacitors, with the faces of the ordinary, cheap silicon transistors sanded, lots of potting compound spilled inside and for sale on Ebay for $400!!!
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
So, the LFC style reduction seems to work indeed... you are productive I have to say! I should build this just to tame my curiosity.
- mictester
- Old Solderhand
Information
Build it by all means - it works as well as a Dynacomp! If you want to use it connected directly to your guitar, you'll have to increse the input impedance as described!Broadcaster wrote:So, the LFC style reduction seems to work indeed... you are productive I have to say! I should build this just to tame my curiosity.
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
- mictester
- Old Solderhand
Information
branleur wrote:Thanks for sharing I just need a simple compressor without OTA for another project. It seems I lucky
EDIT: Has anyone have a EHX LFC corrected schematic
I haven't got the EHX LFC circuit, but look at the next thread!
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
- earthtonesaudio
- Transistor Tuner
It would probably be worthwhile to swap the first stage for something biased a little more conventionally. Actually the part values make it look like Q1 was supposed to be an NPN emitter follower... is that a typo?
rocklander wrote:hairsplitting and semantics aren't exactly the same thing though.. we may need two contests for that.
- mictester
- Old Solderhand
Information
Not at all - it was originally built that way. However - an NPN would work, though it would be better to have some gain in the first stage.earthtonesaudio wrote:It would probably be worthwhile to swap the first stage for something biased a little more conventionally. Actually the part values make it look like Q1 was supposed to be an NPN emitter follower... is that a typo?
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
- DougH
- Transistor Tuner
With a BJT it's not a good idea to raise the base biasing network resistors too high. For one thing, the input impedance of an emitter-follower will always be dominated by (hfe + 1) * Re (Art of Electronics 2nd ed. pg. 66). So scaling up those base resistors really doesn't raise the Zin of the follower. It just reduces the bias current supplied to the base. Secondly, a good rule of thumb is to keep the parallel combo of the base resistors much lower than hfe * Re, in order to bias it correctly (Art of Electronics 2nd ed. pg. 70).mictester wrote:
The input impedance was originally designed to be about 10k as it was going to be used after another effect pedal. If you want to connect it first in line, before all your other toys, you'll need a higher input impedance: increase the two input bias resistors to 330k or 470k and reduce the input capacitor to 100n or even as low as 47n.
So a BJT emitter-follower with high value base resistors still has a low input impedance and may not bias correctly. A better solution is to use a device with a high Zin like a JFET for example, for your input buffer.
Your compressor circuit looks nice. A few years ago I came up with a 2 transistor/MOSFET pin diode compressor for guitar. It wasn't the greatest compressor in the world but was fun to play with and a real simple circuit.
"You have just tubescreamered or fuzzfaced yourself " -polarbearfx
- DougH
- Transistor Tuner
Oh, I just noticed- your input stage is a gain stage not an emitter follower.
Same basic principle applies though. For higher Zin use a different device (MOSFET or JFET).
Same basic principle applies though. For higher Zin use a different device (MOSFET or JFET).
"You have just tubescreamered or fuzzfaced yourself " -polarbearfx
The device seems to produce considerable distortion:
1. The very first stage has too much gain to process the guitar attack without severe clipping
2. The BJT "shunt" usually begins to distort signal at approx. 0,6 Volts peak-to-peak.
So, those two factors should introduce considerable non-linearity.
At the same time the first stage bias and operation points are very unusual.
1. The very first stage has too much gain to process the guitar attack without severe clipping
2. The BJT "shunt" usually begins to distort signal at approx. 0,6 Volts peak-to-peak.
So, those two factors should introduce considerable non-linearity.
At the same time the first stage bias and operation points are very unusual.
- Zodd42
- Breadboard Brother
So, does this thing work or not?DDD wrote:The device seems to produce considerable distortion:
1. The very first stage has too much gain to process the guitar attack without severe clipping
2. The BJT "shunt" usually begins to distort signal at approx. 0,6 Volts peak-to-peak.
So, those two factors should introduce considerable non-linearity.
At the same time the first stage bias and operation points are very unusual.
I'm buying the parts tonight, wondering how to wire this thing, not great with schemos yet . . .
are those caps supposed to be 47u or 4.7u?
- mictester
- Old Solderhand
Information
blueduck577 wrote:are those caps supposed to be 47u or 4.7u?
They're 47uF.
"Why is it humming?" "Because it doesn't know the words!"
OK I just breadboarded it. Some notes:
First I put a JFET source follower on the front end to increase the input Z. Also, I tried building it with a PNP transistor (BC327) in the first stage but it clipped and gated horribly so I put in an NPN (2N4401) to make it an emitter follower.
If anything this compressor is very subtle... I don't have any extra dpdt switches right now to set up a bypass to A/B but I didn't hear significant compression really. I figured maybe my guitar's signal was too weak to get over the diode forward voltage so I replaced the diodes with 1n34a and I still didn't hear much of a change. However when I pinched the leads of the diode that doesnt go to ground with my fingers I did hear the gain reduction...
your thoughts?
First I put a JFET source follower on the front end to increase the input Z. Also, I tried building it with a PNP transistor (BC327) in the first stage but it clipped and gated horribly so I put in an NPN (2N4401) to make it an emitter follower.
If anything this compressor is very subtle... I don't have any extra dpdt switches right now to set up a bypass to A/B but I didn't hear significant compression really. I figured maybe my guitar's signal was too weak to get over the diode forward voltage so I replaced the diodes with 1n34a and I still didn't hear much of a change. However when I pinched the leads of the diode that doesnt go to ground with my fingers I did hear the gain reduction...
your thoughts?
- Zodd42
- Breadboard Brother
Built a piezo buzzer pickup for my Cort flat top. It hurts to play it through the amp which is why I'm on this thread. To reiterate Blueduck up there, any thoughts on his findings?
I have one of those switches, still trying to track down those caps. When I finish the build I'll post my results.
I have one of those switches, still trying to track down those caps. When I finish the build I'll post my results.
Information
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 23 Sep 2007, 20:09
- Location: Sunny California
- Contact:
How about simple JFET buffer on the front end.
Me thinks that would work, correct?
Scott
Me thinks that would work, correct?
Scott
- Zodd42
- Breadboard Brother
I'm not sure 'Wampas.
Aren't compressors working when you can't hear them though? I mean a good compressor should shape your signal in such a way that cuts through the band unnoticed? Hmmm, my communication skills are subpar today . . .
Aren't compressors working when you can't hear them though? I mean a good compressor should shape your signal in such a way that cuts through the band unnoticed? Hmmm, my communication skills are subpar today . . .
Information
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 07 Mar 2010, 16:08
- Location: Paris, France
I also agree !DDD wrote:The device seems to produce considerable distortion:
1. The very first stage has too much gain to process the guitar attack without severe clipping
2. The BJT "shunt" usually begins to distort signal at approx. 0,6 Volts peak-to-peak.
So, those two factors should introduce considerable non-linearity.
At the same time the first stage bias and operation points are very unusual.
- Clipping can even rise well before 0.6Vcc, depending the BJT attenuation ratio. (fortunately here, we have some gain AFTER the BJT, which decrease its AC level )
- Bias first stage: also, if we have here a PNP (why ?) at the first high gain stage (# -150 unloaded), it would be better to have a Bias of 470K instead of 22K to +9V, and 2.7M instead of 22K to GND, in respect to Vcc/2 at the collector out (2.7M should actually be trimmable 1Mpot+1.8M, because the high Gain). IMO, a gain of # 20 would be sufficient firstStage.
As someone said, for a guitar purpose, a buffer is mandatory before (JFet or BJT Emitter Follower), because the actual input impedance Zin of this stage is # h11= 20K if ic=450µA: well below the 2xRbias bridge in //
- Also, at fast attack guitar signal, the "charge injection" of the base current of the gain control would create some large "DC offset transient step" at the BJT attenuator out: for a guitar.. why not like a "slap" !
just a few ideas to try here ... (some already mentioned)
- replace the two 22k resistors by 1Meg
- stick a 1k/22uF parallel combo in the emitter circuit of the front PNP device - the stage could be NPN version, no diff
- try Ge diodes instead of Si ... will give lower threshold
- if you replace the 15k resistor by 100k pot that will give you a rough "ratio" control
- the 680r emitter resistor in the output buffer could be a little higher, 4k7 would be fine there (less noisy)
- adjust/reduce input cap to taste (0.02u perhaps ?)
good effort !
HR
- replace the two 22k resistors by 1Meg
- stick a 1k/22uF parallel combo in the emitter circuit of the front PNP device - the stage could be NPN version, no diff
- try Ge diodes instead of Si ... will give lower threshold
- if you replace the 15k resistor by 100k pot that will give you a rough "ratio" control
- the 680r emitter resistor in the output buffer could be a little higher, 4k7 would be fine there (less noisy)
- adjust/reduce input cap to taste (0.02u perhaps ?)
good effort !
HR